Parental Mediation of Undesired Advertising Effects

By Moniek Buijzen, Patti M. Valkenburg. 2005

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d6fcc573939575f1a71faa73b470af17eed70c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Developing and Validating the Perceived Parental Media Mediation Scale: A Self‐Determination Perspective (2013, background): “…attitudes toward art and culture (Valkenburg, Krcmar, & De Roos, 1998), or reduce undesirable ones, including media-induced aggression (Nathanson, 2004), fear responses (Wilson & Weiss, 1991), parent–child conflict (Buijzen & Valkenburg, 2005), and alcohol use (Austin, Pinkleton, & Fujioka, 2000).”
Parental Co-Use of Media Technology with their Young Children in the USA (2015, background): “…with their children include parents’ accessibility, engagement, and involvement (Warren, 2001; Warren et al., 2002); family communication styles (Buijzen & Valkenburg, 2005; Fujioka & Austin, 2002); and level of parental education, with less educated parents being more likely to coview…”
Reducing Harm From Media: A Meta-Analysis of Parental Mediation (2019, background): “Nevertheless, a substantial number of studies have examined how family communication, beliefs regarding media negative effects, and media consumption affect parental mediation (e.g., An & Lee, 2010; Austin, Bolls, Fujioka, & Engelbertson, 1999; Buijzen & Valkenburg, 2005).”
Reconsidering Advertising Literacy as a Defense Against Advertising Effects (2011, background): “Despite this, several studies show that when children are watching television in a family context, many parents provide them with comments about what they see on television (Boush, 2001; Buijzen & Valkenburg, 2005).”
Surveying Parental Mediation: Connections, Challenges and Questions for Media Literacy (2009, background): “In a study of eight to twelve-yearold children and their parents, Buijzen and Valkenburg (2005) found that the use of restrictive mediation for mitigating the negative effects for advertising did less to empower children to think critically for themselves than active mediation.”
Development and Validation of a Survey Instrument to Measure Children's Advertising Literacy (2016, methodology): “…mediation, which includes making deliberate comments and judgments about television commercials and actively explaining the nature and selling intent of advertising (Buijzen & Valkenburg, 2005), is expected to relate positively to the conceptual and attitudinal dimension of advertising literacy.”
Do You See What I See? Parent and Child Reports of Parental Monitoring of Media (2012, background): “…active mediation can reduce negative effects of television on children, including modifying undesirable responses to advertising (Buijzen, 2009; Buijzen & Valkenburg, 2005), news (Buijzen, Walma van der Molen, & Sondij, 2007), violent programming (Corder-Bolz, 1980; Nathanson, 1999, 2004;…”