Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Second Edition

2,779 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Development of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in Spanish-speaking language minority learners: A parallel process latent growth curve model (2011, methodology): “Therefore, we used Rasch scaling methods (Bond & Fox, 2007) to develop vertically equated developmental scale scores for the morphological awareness task.”
Is Psychometrics Pathological Science? (2008, background): “However, explicit mention of the hypothesis that the relevant psychological attribute is quantitative is missing from expositions of item response models (e.g., Bond & Fox, 2001; Embretson & Reise, 2000; Hambleton, Swaminathan, & Rogers, 1991; Suen, 1990).”
The Word Part Levels Test (2017, background): “…ways in which poorly working items are detected using fit statistics which ‘help to determine whether the item estimations may be held as meaningful quantitative summaries of the observations (i.e. whether each item contributes to the measurement of only one construct)’ (Bond & Fox, 2007, p. 35).”
Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: the Research‐Based Early Maths Assessment (2008, methodology): “We defined mathematical competence as a latent trait using the Rasch model (Bond & Fox, 2001; Linacre, 2005; Watson, Callingham, & Kelly, 2007), leading to scores that locate children on a common ability scale with a consistent, justifiable metric, allowing accurate comparisons, even across ages,…”