Evaluating the effectiveness of interorganizational relations through networks

By Myrna P. Mandell, R. Keast. 2008

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a982b32d04d70d61a8d087e3916467de010eb09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Donald P. Moynihan
2. Kaifeng Yang
3. Bradley E. Wright
4. Sergio Fernandez
5. S. Osborne
6. J. Caillier
7. Sanjay K. Pandey
8. L. B. Andersen

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Bradley E. Wright
2. Soonhee Kim
3. Sergio Fernandez
4. S. Osborne
5. Donald P. Moynihan
6. Kaifeng Yang

In Public Administration

1. Donald P. Moynihan
2. Kaifeng Yang
3. Sergio Fernandez
4. Bradley E. Wright
5. Soonhee Kim
6. S. Osborne
7. J. Caillier
8. Sanjay K. Pandey

Citations in the corpus

• Delivering Public Services: Time for a new theory? (2010, background): “1997) it is only now that appropriate attention is being given to the evaluation of the process of network governance itself, rather than of the impacts of these networks upon public services (e.g. Head 2008; Mandell and Keast 2008).”
• Performance Regimes Amidst Governance Complexity (2011, background): “For example, Provan and Milward (2001) call for assessing network effectiveness at the community, network, and participant levels, while Mandell and Keast (2008) offer criteria for measuring performance at the environmental, organizational, and operational levels of the network.”