Managing Group Behavior: The Interplay Between Procedural Justice, Sense of Self, and Cooperation
By David de Cremer, Tom Tyler. 2005
249 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49d01653d6cc9ed46b593aa4b34af6e76771ff60
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety Research
- D. van Knippenberg
- David de Cremer
- M. Dijke
- M. Hogg
- David M. Mayer
- Niels Van Quaquebeke
- Tom Tyler
- Ofir Turel
In Social Psychology
- D. van Knippenberg
- David de Cremer
- M. Hogg
- Constantine Sedikides
- Fred Walumbwa
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- David E. Rast
- Niels Van Quaquebeke
In Sociology and Political Science
- D. van Knippenberg
- David de Cremer
- M. Hogg
- Constantine Sedikides
- David E. Rast
- Niels Van Quaquebeke
- Tom Tyler
- Lindred L. Greer
Citations in the corpus
- The dysfunctions of power in teams: A review and emergent conflict perspective (2017, background): “…that low power individuals tend to justify the power dispersed system that they are part of, and as such do not necessarily rebel against it (De Cremer & Tyler, 2005; Jost & Banaji, 1994; Sidanius, 1993; Sidanius et al., 1991), this does not mean that low power individuals are unaware of or…”
- Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance (2016, background): “The link between justice and voluntary cooperation and compliance has been demonstrated in numerous studies and social dilemma experiments (De Cremer 2003, De Cremer and Tyler 2005).”
- How the Grapevine Keeps You in Line (2011, background): “The impression that one makes in a certain social interaction can be communicated through gossip, thus possibly leading to exclusion from groups and reputation damage (see De Cremer & Sedikides, 2008; De Cremer & Tyler, 2005a, 2005b; Hardy & Van Vugt, 2006; Van Vugt & Hardy, 2010).”
- Do servant-leaders help satisfy follower needs? An organizational justice perspective (2008, background): “De Cremer and Tyler (2005) also focus on the integration of justice and basic human needs.”
- Public Participation and Institutional Fit: A Social–Psychological Perspective (2013, background): “In short, we believe the concept of institutional acceptance has great potential as an indicator of social fit but needs additional refinement to be fully incorporated in formal analyses.”
- Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice (2011, background): “Trust building may be even more far-reaching because trust promotes cooperation across many forms of social interaction (Dawes, 1980; De Cremer & Tyler, 2005) and thus paves the way for a positive intergroup climate characterized by mutual cooperation.”
- Leaning Out: How Negative Recruitment Experiences Shape Women’s Decisions to Compete for Executive Roles (2017, background): “Fair treatment, in turn, affects individuals’ behavior in the group, motivating them to cooperate and engage (De Cremer and Tyler, 2005).”
- Process-based leadership: Fair procedures and reactions to organizational change ☆ (2005, background): “Indeed, prior research has convincingly shown that fair procedures significantly affect employees’ identity and self (see De Cremer & Tyler, 2005b, for an overview).”
- The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments (2012, background): “…enhanced identification is associated with greater conformity to norms and stronger ingroup favouritism (e.g., see Abrams & Hogg, 2010) and with fairer treatment of fellow ingroup members and more pronounced promotion of the group’s goals and welfare (De Cremer & Tyler, 2005; Tyler & Lind, 1992).”
- Identity Negotiation at Work (2009, background): “…organizational commitment (e.g., Johnson & Chang, 2006), group performance and functioning (London, Polzer, & Omoregie, 2005), reactions to justice (e.g., De Cremer & Tyler, 2005; Wiesenfeld, Swann, Brockner, & Bartel, 2007), and changes in the nature of the workplace (e.g., Thatcher & Zhu, 2006).”