A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Learning
By Maria Minniti, W. Bygrave. 2001
1,181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48d2eb027f43e25664dd7f9d4401749244b7c9a8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Per Davidsson
- Gavin Cassar
- A. McKelvie
- Dimo Dimov
- Keith M. Hmieleski
- Shaker A. Zahra
- M. van Gelderen
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Keith M. Hmieleski
- Michael D. Ensley
- B. Mathias
- Jens M. Unger
- Hao Zhao
- Deniz Ucbasaran
- N. Boso
- Colin Mason
In Strategy and Management
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Dimo Dimov
- Shaker A. Zahra
- A. McKelvie
- Mike W. Peng
- Per Davidsson
- Matthew S. Wood
- Yasuhiro Yamakawa
Citations in the corpus
- Learning Opportunities and Learning Behaviours of Small Business Starters: Relations with Goal Achievement, Skill Development and Satisfaction (2004, background): “Focussing on the individual, the decision to improve the old or to do something new is also considered by Minniti and Bygrave (2001) in their model of entrepreneurial learning.”
- An investigation of hindsight bias in nascent venture activity (2009, background): “Nascent activity provides individuals with considerable opportunities for distilling and interpreting direct and indirect feedback, which enables the making sense of the dynamic entrepreneurship environment (Harrison & Leitch, 2005; Minniti & Bygrave, 2001; Parker, 2006).”
- From Opportunity Insight to Opportunity Intention: The Importance of Person–Situation Learning Match (2007, background): “As meaning emerges from one’s prior experience (Weick, 1979), opportunity development is inherently linked to the dynamics of experience and is thus a learning process (Cope, 2005; Dutta & Crossan, 2005; Minniti & Bygrave, 2001; Ravasi & Turati, 2005).”
- Teaching Entrepreneurship to University Students through Experiential Learning (2013, background): “It is increasingly recognized that to be effective entrepreneurial learning has to be experiential (Rae and Carswell, 2000; Minniti and Bygrave, 2001; Lange et al, 2012).”
- The Influence of Gender on Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceptual Factors (2016, background): “…on the ntrepreneurial intention reported by women, since as a arge body of research has argued, role models can help to vercome fear of failure and lack of experience, as well as o strength the entrepreneurial self-efficacy (BarNir et al., 011; Buunk et al., 2007; Minniti and Bygrave, 2001).”
- Simulating Entrepreneurial Learning (2007, neutral): “Overcoming opportunities and problems is identified as a central feature of how entrepreneurs learn (Reuber and Fischer, 1999; Young and Sexton, 1997; Minniti and Bygrave, 2001) and ‘major setbacks’ (Reuber and Fischer, 1993; Deakins and”
- Do serial entrepreneurs run successively better-performing businesses? (2013, background): “…of the researcher, including whether entrepreneurs' performance tends to improve when they try venturing again, perhaps because they learn fromexperience (Minniti and Bygrave, 2001; Parker, 2006) or acquire valuable resources in the course of the venturing process (Davidsson and Honig, 2003).”
- Entrepreneurial orientation: A psychological model of success among southern African small business owners (2005, background): “Learning from positive as well as negative experiences is essential for successful entrepreneurial behaviour (Minniti & Bygrave, 2001).”
- The Effects of Business Failure Experience on Successive Entrepreneurial Engagements: An Evolutionary Phase Model (2018, background): “Thus, entrepreneurial learning theory suggests that failure events that an entrepreneur experiences serves as a reservoir of knowledge (Minniti & Bygrave, 2001) from which the entrepreneur can draw insights and lessons to shape the behaviors, routines, and processes adopted in subsequently started…”
- Venture failure, stigma, and impression management: A self‐verification, self‐determination view (2011, background): “Recently, the implications of organizational failure have been the subject of heightened scholarly interest (Minniti and Bygrave, 2001; Shepherd, 2003) and much of this research has assumed a psychological lens to consider how failure may impede or propel future entrepreneurial behaviors and outcome”
- The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. (2005, background): “Skills and performance strategies useful for the entrepreneurial role are likely to be acquired from previous experience as an entrepreneur, even in the case of past failure (Minniti & Bygrave, 2001).”
- Life After Business Failure (2013, background): “…& Edmonson, 2005; Madsen & Desai, 2010; Sitkin, 1992; Mellahi & Wilkinson, 2004) and entrepreneurship scholars (e.g., Cope, 2011; McGrath, 1999; Minniti & Bygrave, 2001; Politis, 2005; Rerup, 2005; Shepherd, 2003) as illustrated below: Learning from failure is a hallmark of the technology…”