Predicting Early School Achievement With the EDI: A Longitudinal Population-Based Study

By N. Forget-Dubois, Jean-Pascal Lemelin, M. Boivin, G. Dionne, J. Séguin, F. Vitaro, Richard E. Tremblay. 2007

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48235df341fdd95e52e42816e389419aec905f01

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. N. Rao
2. Hui Li
3. M. Janus
4. S. Brinkman

In Education

1. E. Lau
2. Hui Li
3. S. Brinkman
4. N. Rao
5. M. Janus

Citations in the corpus

• Associations Between the Early Development Instrument at Age 5, and Reading and Numeracy Skills at Ages 8, 10 and 12: a Prospective Linked Data Study (2013, background): “Studies have found the Instrument to have very good internal and test-retest reliability and external validity (Forget-Dubois et al. 2007; Guhn and Goelman 2011; Guhn et al. 2011; Janus et al. 2011; Janus and Offord 2007).”
• Parental involvement and children's readiness for school in China (2011, background): “Therefore, a variety of measures (report, test, interview) and sources (child, parent, teacher) need to be used to assess children’s readiness for school (Blair 2006; Fiorentino and Howe 2004; Forget-Dubois et al. 2007; Lemelin et al. 2007).”