What Is M&A Performance?
By Maurizio Zollo, Degenhard Meier. 2008
460 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/469be8b8d0d210c1212e7236f28f214ff1acad5a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Shlomo Yedidia Y. Tarba
- Ji-Yub Kim
- Yaakov Weber
- Jerayr Haleblian
- Sydney Finkelstein
- Riikka M. Sarala
- Duncan N. Angwin
- S. Teerikangas
In Strategy and Management
- Shlomo Yedidia Y. Tarba
- Yaakov Weber
- Riikka M. Sarala
- Sydney Finkelstein
- Duncan N. Angwin
- S. Teerikangas
- Jerayr Haleblian
- Ji-Yub Kim
Citations in the corpus
- All Aspirations are not Created Equal: The Differential Effects of Historical and Social Aspirations on Acquisition Behavior (2014, methodology): “…used analytic approach for measuring acquisition performance in prior research in strategy (e.g., Capron & Pistre, 2002; Hayward, 2002) and finance (e.g., Kaplan & Weisbach, 1992; Mitchell & Lehn, 1990), it is a measure of expected rather than realized performance gains (Zollo & Meier, 2008).”
- Measuring the performance of acquisitions:an empirical investigation using multiple criteria (2010, unknown): “Zollo and Meier (2008) after reviewing 97 papers published in top management and finance journals concluded that the vast majority of the published research on the performance of M&As can be classified into three research streams.”
- Sociocultural Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions: Unresolved Paradoxes and Directions for Future Research (2013, methodology): “Accordingly, measures need to more clearly distinguish what kind of performance is actually measured (Tuch & O'Sullivan, 2007), and, at the very least, the level of analysis should be specified (task, transaction, firm level) (Zollo & Meier, 2008).”
- Dynamics of Acquired Firm Pre-Acquisition Employee Reactions (2012, methodology): “Recent critical reviews and meta-analyses (King et al., 2004; Stahl & Voigt, 2008; Zollo & Meier, 2008) have pointed out, however, that the reality behind these figures is even more confused.”