Active and Passive Accomplices: The Communal Character of Workplace Bullying
By Gary Namie, Pamela Lutgen-Sandvik. 2010
121 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45f26d86f587a55e91fb7ab44d347d9774a78442
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Pamela Lutgen-Sandvik
- A. Skogstad
- Staale Einarsen
- Sarah J. Tracy
- Leo Kant
- Torbjørn Torsheim
- M. Paull
- Maryam Omari
Citations in the corpus
- Workplace Bullying, Mobbing and General Harassment: A Review (2013, unknown): “In a recent paper, Namie and Lutgen-Sandvik (2010) emphasised the role that upper management, HR, and colleagues, can play by either overtly joining in or passively supporting the bullying through inaction.”
- Answering Five Key Questions About Workplace Bullying (2012, background): “Pam (first author) realized the importance of strategically aligning with workplace bullying activists early in her career and partnered with the Workplace Bullying Trauma Institute (WBI; http://www.workplacebullying. org/), the leading activist center in the United States.”
- When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying (2012, background): “Oh and Hazler (2009, 304) observe that bystanders’ ‘roles may range from assisting bullies to defending victims .... [and] have the potential to change power dynamics in bullying and therefore may be able to decrease school bullying.’ Gini, Albeiro, Benelli and Altoe (2008) found that that adolescen”
- Beware the angry leader: Trait anger and trait anxiety as predictors of petty tyranny ☆ (2013, background): “We suggest the reach of petty tyranny to be particularly similar to that of bullying, with many parties involved—even so in the popular scenario of a single perpetrator and a single victim (Namie & Lutgen-Sandvik, 2010; Salmivalli, 2010).”