Toward More Creative and Innovative Group Idea Generation: A Cognitive‐Social‐Motivational Perspective of Brainstorming

By Paul B. Paulus, Vincent R. Brown. 2007

345 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45df2d5f994a43d81536b2ef240914fcbb4fa82a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Social influence, creativity and innovation (2008, background): “Our own perspective is that task focus is the key (Paulus & Brown, 2007; see also Sternberg & Lubart, 1995).”
Leadership, Creative Problem-Solving Capacity, and Creative Performance: The Importance of Knowledge Sharing (2013, background): “Paulus and colleagues documented the benefits of sharing ideas, and the need for group members to pay careful attention to shared ideas to enhance creativity (Paulus & Brown, 2007; Paulus & Coskun, 2013; Paulus, Nakui, & Putman, 2006).”
To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas (2014, neutral): “The controlled retrieval, selection, and integration of stored knowledge are considered as central cognitive processes in divergent thinking which requires retrieving and selecting relevant remote associations, integration of loosely related semantic concepts, and eventually verbal elaboration of id”
Experiencing Creativity in the Organization: From Individual Creativity to Collective Creativity (2012, background): “Idea generation sessions are cognitive processes which are strongly moderated by social and motivational factors (Paulus & Brown, 2007).”
Collaborative fixation: effects of others' ideas on brainstorming (2011, result): “Although the present experiments are not a direct test of the model proposed by Paulus and Brown (2007), the results are clearly consistent with their view that ideas are semantically related.”