Relationship between Instructional Context and Views of Nature of Science
By R. Khishfe, Norman G. Lederman. 2007
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/446e43dd5fb710df44546fae126864e3db31628a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Troy D. Sadler
- D. Zeidler
- Chin-Chung Tsai
- J. J. Matkins
- Ying-Tien Wu
- Scott Applebaum
- B. Gansneder
- A. Lewis
In Education
- Troy D. Sadler
- D. Zeidler
- Scott Applebaum
- B. Gansneder
- J. J. Matkins
- Chin-Chung Tsai
- A. Lewis
- Jennifer L. Eastwood
Citations in the corpus
- Impacts of Contextual and Explicit Instruction on Preservice Elementary Teachers' Understandings of the Nature of Science. (2011, background): “In the second study, the effectiveness of contextual versus noncontextual nature of science instruction was compared for high school students in biology, chemistry, and environmental science (Khishfe & Lederman, 2007).”
- Contextualizing Nature of Science Instruction in Socioscientific Issues (2012, background): “Studies that compare integrated and non-integrated approaches with high school students (Khishfe & Lederman, 2006, 2007) have shown learner gains in NOS conceptions for both conditions, but no significant differences between the two approaches.”
- ‘Am I Like a Scientist?’: Primary children's images of doing science in school (2014, background): “As Kim et al. (2013) have argued, teachers’ misconception about scientific inquiry would influence their instructional choice by adopting a didactic pedagogical approach similar to what we observed in this study.”