Informal workplace learning: An exploration of age differences in learning competence.
By M. Schulz, Christian Roßnagel. 2010
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Human Factors and Ergonomics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/427a2eb4fd26864e1a56b928eb5b419807be1964
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Human Factors and Ergonomics
Citations in the corpus
- Integrative Literature Review on Informal Learning: Antecedents, Conceptualizations, and Future Directions (2018, background): “Scholars have noted that the nature of informal learning is complex and multi-faceted, involving cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational dimensions embedded in a sociocultural context (Schulz & Roßnagel, 2010).”
- Antecedents of Employees’ Involvement in Work-Related Learning (2013, background): “…be given to possible differences in antecedents between these two types of learning, as the results of the studies that did differentiate between them seem to indicate that different patterns might arise between formal and informal learning (e.g., Chan & Auster, 2003; Schulz & Roβnagel, 2010).”