The Psychology of Rivalry: A Relationally Dependent Analysis of Competition

By Gavin J. Kilduff, Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Barry M. Staw. 2010

544 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/426f440f65fccbd979f569453ded379c9b92b9dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Dan S. Chiaburu
2. Jochen I. Menges
3. Martin Kilduff
4. Denise A Jackson

In Safety Research

1. Eric Chen
2. Dan S. Chiaburu
3. Gavin J. Kilduff
4. Riitta Katila

In Sociology and Political Science

1. David Miller
2. Dan S. Chiaburu
3. Jochen I. Menges
4. Martin Kilduff
5. Ming-Jer Chen
6. Riitta Katila

Citations in the corpus

• Whatever It Takes to Win: Rivalry Increases Unethical Behavior (2016, background): “We follow Kilduff et al. (2010) in conceptualizing rivalry as a relationship between a focal actor and a target actor that is characterized by the experience of heightened psychological stakes of competition by the focal actor when competing against the target actor.”
• All the right moves: How entrepreneurial firms compete effectively (2012, background): “…to new market segments by entrepreneurial fi rms are less likely to be retaliated against because larger competitors tend to pay attention to and retaliate against rivals that are visible to them, such as those large in size or similar in characteristics (Kilduff, Elfenbein, and Staw, 2010).”
• Rival conceptions of rivalry: why some competitions mean more than others (2015, unknown): “While many of our respondents supported Kilduff et al. (2010) conception of rivalry as resulting from historic competitiveness, an ‘underdog’ component also emerged.”
• Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: : A multidimensional framework (2015, background): “It allows multilevel investigations that link micro and macro organizational research (Kilduff, Elfenbein, and Staw, 2010) as well as studies of competition and cooperation (Gnyawali and Madhavan, 2001).”
• Strategic Use of Emotional Intelligence in Organizational Settings: Exploring the Dark Side (2010, background): “In the world of office work, employees who repeatedly compete for bonuses may come to view each other as rivals for career advancement ( [19_TD$DIFF]Kilduff et al., 2010).”