Consumer and Market Drivers of the Trial Probability of New Consumer Packaged Goods
By Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp, Katrijn Gielens. 2003
343 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4227097648b9b72a665cc0c0e41ac4280db395e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp
- Marnik G. Dekimpe
- Dominique M. Hanssens
- Albert Maydeu-Olivares
- Martijn G. de Jong
- Vincent R. Nijs
- Koen Pauwels
- Bert Weijters
Citations in the corpus
- The “Right” Consumers for Better Concepts: Identifying Consumers High in Emergent Nature to Develop New Product Concepts (2010, methodology): “…constituting our original emergent nature scale, an existing eight-item scale measuring a consumer’s tendency toward dispositional innovativeness (Steenkamp and Gielens 2003), Rook and Fisher’s (1995) nine-item scale of impulse buying, and eight items constituting our original lead user status…”
- The proximity effect: The role of inter-item distance on reverse-item bias (2009, methodology): “Furthermore, we dispersed the items of two balanced multi-item scales throughout the questionnaire: dispositional innovativeness, consisting of 3 nonreversed and 5 reversed items, and market mavenism, consisting of 2 nonreversed and 2 reversed items (Steenkamp & Gielens, 2003).”
- Competitive Reactions to Advertising and Promotion Attacks (2005, background): “Impulse categories are typically bought on a whim when the urge strikes the consumer (Steenkamp and Gielens 2003 ).”
- Susceptibility to and impact of interpersonal influence in an investment context (2009, background): “Recent studies on consumer innovativeness (Clark and Goldsmith 2006; Steenkamp and Gielens 2003), for example, show that consumers who are susceptible to the influence of others are less inclined to purchase innovative products, such as new financial services, early.”
- How Business Cycles Contribute to Private-Label Success: Evidence from the United States and Europe (2007, background): “Similarly, Steenkamp and Gielens (2003) find that new products that were heavily advertised achieved a trial rate that was 72% higher than the trial rate of new products that did not receive much advertising support.”
- Impulse purchases of new products: an empirical analysis (2009, background): “Substantial research on innovations has appeared in the consumer behavior, marketing and management literatures over the last 30 years (Rogers, 1976; Olshavsky and Spreng, 1996; Moreau et al., 2001; Mukherjee and Hoyer, 2001; Steenkamp and Gielens, 2003).”
- A Global Investigation into the Constellation of Consumer Attitudes toward Global and Local Products (2010, methodology): “Innovative consumers seek to fulfill their need for change through new consumption experiences (Steenkamp and Gielens 2003).”
- Self Efficacy, Self Personality and Self Confidence on Entrepreneurial Intention: Study on Young Enterprises (2019, background): “The understanding of internal aspect of individual provides information to evaluate a decision and give an integrative view about behavior that cannot be controlled by other people (Steenkamp & Gielens, 2003).”
- Perspectives and Dimensions of Consumer Innovativeness: A Literature Review and Future Agenda (2014, result): “Some of these studies (Mudd 1990; Steenkamp and Baumgartner 1992; Steenkamp and Burgess 2002; Im et al. 2003; Steenkamp and Gielens 2003; Cotte and Wood 2004) denoted a positive significant relation, while other studies (Venkatraman 1991; Bäckström, PirttiläBeckman, and Tuorila 2004;…”