Second language interaction: current perspectives and future trends

By Micheline B. Chalhoub-Deville. 2003

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40cc72c3b818e4f48fadb3fe932e06803ec6c1c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. F. Scott Davidson
2. J. Kemp
3. Glenn Fulcher
4. Lyn May
5. Lindsay Brooks
6. Yan-ping Jin
7. Liying Cheng
8. Daniel M. K. Lam

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Glenn Fulcher
2. Lyn May
3. Yan-ping Jin
4. F. Scott Davidson
5. J. Kemp
6. R. Young
7. Robert J. Mislevy
8. Janna Fox

Citations in the corpus

• Motivation and Test Anxiety in Test Performance across Three Testing Contexts: The CAEL, CET, and GEPT. (2014, background): “In doing so, more contextual variables can be studied to explore the importance of ability-in-language user-in-context (Chalhoub-Deville, 2003).”
• LEARNING AS CHANGING PARTICIPATION: DISCOURSE ROLES IN ESL WRITING CONFERENCES (2004, background): “Goodwin, 1992; Jacoby & Ochs, 1995; Shea, 1994), communicative practice (Hanks, 1996b), and interactional competence (Chalhoub-Deville, 2003; Hall, 1993, 1995; He & Young, 1998; Kramsch, 1986; Young, 1999, 2002) has argued that language and context are mutually constitutive.”
• Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance (2009, background): “In any test involving oral interaction, performance is co- constructed among the participants (Chalhoub-Deville, 2003; Deville & Chalhoub-Deville, 2006; McNamara, 1997; Swain, 2001).”
• Effective rating scale development for speaking tests: Performance decision trees (2011, background): “…of context and interaction in the assessment of speaking has been widely demonstrated (Kramsch, 1986; Jacoby and McNamara, 1999; Jacoby and Ochs, 1995), and the socially constructed nature of discourse has become the focus of much research (Swain, 2001; Chalhoub-Deville, 2003; Brooks, 2009).”
• Interactional Competence in a Paired Speaking Test: Features Salient to Raters (2011, background): “Adopting a social interactional perspective has thus created “fundamental challenges” for language testers to address ( Chalhoub-Deville, 2003 ).”
• Validity by Design (2007, background): “(Diversity in tasks allows one to head off different alternative explanations and to observe variation across contexts and characterize it if it is integral to the claim; Chalhoub-Deville, 2003.)”