Assessing Epistemological Beliefs: Schommer’s Questionnaire Revisited

By Geraldine Clarebout, J. Elen, L. Luyten, H. Bamps. 2001

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modeling Epistemic and Ontological Cognition: Philosophical Perspectives and Methodological Directions (2008, methodology): “Numerous authors have highlighted that many studies of personal epistemology report unsatisfactory reliability and validity of scores from quantitative measures using Likert-type items (Clarebout et al., 2001; Muis et al., 2006; Wood & Kardash, 2002; Wood, Kitchener, & Jensen, 2002).”
Personal Epistemology and Culture (2008, background): “A considerable body of research has been conducted in Europe (e.g., Braten et al., 2005; Bromme, 2003; Cano, 2005; Clarebout et al., 2001; De Corte et al., 2002; Mason, 2003b; Mason & Boscolo, 2004; Mason & Scrivani, 2004), with collegial interaction on the topic facilitated through a formal netwo”
Epistemological beliefs across cultures: critique and analysis of beliefs structure studies (2004, unknown): “The methodology and the results reported by Schommer have drawn a number of doubts and critics from other researchers (Clarebout et al., 2001; Hofer & Pintrich, 1997).”
Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: a functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition (2010, methodology): “The factor structures of the most widely used questionnaires have been instable across studies ( Clarebout et al. 2001; DeBacker et al. 2008; Wood and Kardash 2002).”