Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework

By Injazz J. Chen, Antony Paulraj. 2004

765 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ff1098ab7e77e3885d71f1e62e4979c34c3f128

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Dynamic Capability Building in Service Value Networks for Achieving Service Innovation (2009, background): “Because services are inherently bidirectional in nature, employees interact and engage with customers in developing an exchange relationship of trust and communication (Chen & Paulraj, 2004; Harris & Goode, 2004; Lopez, Montes Peon, & Vazquez Ordas, 2004).”
The effects of trust and coercive power on supplier integration (2009, background): “Moreover, items that do not load on the factor they intend to measure, but instead on factors they did not intend to measure, should also be deleted (Chen and Paulraj, 2004).”
Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection (2008, background): “…(Cohen and Lee, 1988; Lee and Billington, 1993; Thomas and Griffin, 1996; Graves and Willems, 2000; Goetschalckx et al., 2002; Chan, 2003; Chen and Paulraj, 2004) propose deriving probability distribution from historical data and model the SC uncertainty (e.g., uncertain demand) using…”
Optimization models for the dynamic facility location and allocation problem (2008, background): “Previous discussions of FL problems show that they can be classified as supply chain management (SCM) problems, as demonstrated by the theoretical framework introduced by Chen and Paularaj ( 2004 ).”
Strategic purchasing, supply management practices and buyer performance improvement: an empirical study of UK manufacturing organisations (2009, background): “However, a critical mass of empirical work analysing the extent to which purchasing strategy influences purchasing practice has yet to develop (Chen and Paulraj 2004).”
Effect of firm characteristics, supplier relationships and techniques used on Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM): an empirical investigation on French industrial firms (2014, background): “Chopra and Sodhi (2004) were one of the firsts to define the SCRM for practitioners.”
The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach (2010, background): “While Chen and Paulraj (2004a) argued that financial performance should be the main measure of SC performance because of the shareholder profit motive, others have described the limitations of relying solely on financial measures of performance (Dixon et al., 1990; Eccles and Pyburn, 1992; Hall,…”
Supply Chain Power Configurations and Their Relationship with Performance (2017, background): “Among the 78 Chi-square tests, only three were non-significant, demonstrating discriminant validity (Bagozzi, et al., 1991; Chen & Paulraj, 2004; Fornell & Larcker, 1981).”
Measuring Supply Chain Performance: Current Research and Future Directions (2006, background): “Distinguishing between cost and non-cost measures (time, quality,flexibility and innovativeness) is important since relying exclusively on cost indicators can produce a misleading picture of supply chain performance ( Chen and Paulraj 2004 ).”
Data-driven supply chains, manufacturing capability and customer satisfaction (2017, background): “While financial indicators are dominant in the literature (Chen and Paulraj 2004), the literature warns against the sole use of financial performance measures, which can misrepresent the organisation’s performance and ignore the opportunity for continuous improvement (Gunasekaran, Patel, and…”
Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review (2009, background): “Of particular relevance is the research on supply chain coordination, which identifies the activities and polices to be pursued by the different supply chain participants to obtain the maximum benefit of the entire supply chain (Kouvelis et al., 2006; Chen and Paulraj, 2004).”
Digital Supply Chain Transformation toward Blockchain Integration (2017, background): “The DSC is characterized by the strategic and operative exchange of information between suppliers (financial, production, design, research, and/or competition) to enhance communication between actors in the chain [6].”
Complementary theories to supply chain management (2007, background): “Chen and Paulraj (2004a, b), Croom et al. (2000), Svensson (2002), Mentzer et al.”
Customer relationship management and innovation capability: an empirical study (2010, background): “stressed the importance of customer involvement in operations, while Chen and Paulraj (2004)”