Complementary theories to supply chain management
By Á. Halldórsson, Herbert Kotzab, Juliana H. Mikkola, Tage Skjøtt-Larsen. 2007
462 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Purpose – The paper seeks to discuss and develop SCM as a scientific discipline using different theories from non-logistics areas to explain interorganizational phenomena. It also attempts to establish a frame of reference that allows us to mitigate the gap between the current SCM research and practice and the theoretical explanations of how to structure and manage supply chains. Design/methodology/approach – The paper introduces three different perspectives that together will contribute to a broader understanding of SCM in practice: an economic perspective; a socio-economic perspective; and a strategic perspective. The theoretical framework is applied to two important research topics within SCM: third party logistics (TPL); and new product development (NPD). Findings – There is no such thing as “a unified theory of SCM”. Depending on the concrete situation, one can choose one theory as the dominant explanatory theory, and then complement it with one or several of the other theoretical perspectives. Research limitations/implications – The way the four theories complement one another is explored on a conceptual basis, but further research into this direction may explore more deeply how these alleged complementarities occur in practice, and how managers mould their decisions by these ideas. Practical implications – The four theories can provide normative support to important management decisions in supply chains, such as outsourcing, safeguards against opportunism, and alignment of incentives. Originality/value – The main contribution is that one cannot rely on one theoretical explanation when analyzing phenomena in SCM. It is neccessary to consider several theories and how they may complement one another in order to provide a more comprehensive view of SCM.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ccf995c1d781cadca730fa0f3217d46abfd39e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Drivers and barriers to reshoring: a literature review on offshoring in reverse (2017, background): “Looking at the broader SCM field, the field itself lacks an all-encompassing theory (Halldorsson et al. 2007), and is known for borrowing knowledge from other fields (Stock, 1997).”