Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes

By C. Rudolph, Ian M. Katz, Kristi N. Lavigne, H. Zacher. 2017

914 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f87e40f4eab045daef20226bfb01a260c2e7408

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Relational job crafting: Exploring the role of employee motives with a weekly diary study (2018, background): “However, when it comes to reducing hindering work demands, the impact on work outcomes is inconsistent and at best weak and negative (Rudolph et al., 2017).”
Transmission of reduction‐oriented crafting among colleagues: A diary study on the moderating role of working conditions (2018, background): “…is, reactive (minimizing demands) and constructive (optimizing demands), and outcomes, and therefore, we enhanced the validity of job crafting conceptualization on a daily basis by ‘unpacking’ the adaptive and counterproductive implications of reduction-oriented crafting (cf. Rudolph et al., 2017).”
The power of empowering leadership: allowing and encouraging followers to take charge of their own jobs (2019, methodology): “Employees with proactive personalities are more prone to try to take charge of their jobs through crafting (meta-analysis by Rudolph et al., 2017).”
From job crafting to home crafting: A daily diary study among six European countries (2020, background): “More generally, empirical evidence consistently suggests that proactive behavior is positively related to vigor and negatively to exhaustion (e.g. meta-analysis by Rudolph et al., 2017).”
Thriving at work: A meta‐analysis (2019, methodology): “Consistent with previous research and best methodological practice, we only included constructs in our meta ‐ analysis that were investigated in three or more independent samples (e.g., Berry, Ones, & Sackett, 2007; King, Dalton, Daily, & Covin, 2004; Rudolph, Katz, Lavigne, & Zacher, 2017).”
Explaining supervisor–subordinate guanxi and subordinate performance through a conservation of resources lens (2019, background): “In addition, job crafting involves proactive behaviors that employees make to balance their job demands and resources with their personal capabilities and needs (Rudolph et al., 2017).”
Effectiveness of job crafting interventions: a meta-analysis and utility analysis (2019, background): “Also, existing meta-analytical results support the relationship between JC and both work engagement and job performance (Rudolph et al., 2017).”
A meta-analysis on promotion- and prevention-focused job crafting (2018, methodology): “…and Personnel Psychology), examined the reference list of a currently published meta-analysis on the resourcebased job crafting conceptualization (Rudolph et al., 2017), searched conference programmes from the Academy of Management, the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology,…”
Crafting a job in ‘tough times’: When being proactive is positively related to work attachment (2018, background): “Moreover, a recent meta-analysis by Rudolph et al. (2017) with 122 independent samples (35,670 workers) showed that contraction job crafting (e.g., decreasing hindering demands) is positively related to employee turnover intention (an indicator of low work attachment, or work detachment).2…”