What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: An appraisal perspective on person perception

By Shlomo Hareli, Ursula Hess. 2010

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ba18fdb9d251c9dcd54d8630abe12f581b67c9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it (2014, background): “Because emotions have such distinct appraisal patterns, they provide a wealth of information to perceivers (Hareli and Hess, 2010; Van Kleef, 2009).”
Emotion is for influence (2011, background): “In addition to emotional contagion, affective reactions may take the form of favourable or unfavourable impressions (Hareli & Hess, 2010 ; Knutson, 1996 ).”
The many faces of emotional contagion (2014, unknown): “We engage in backtracking (Elfenbein, 2007), which allows us to use our awareness of another person’s cues to infer their symptoms, intentional signals, and symbols (see also Hareli & Hess, 2010; Hareli & Rafaeli, 2008; Parkinson, 2011).”
The Intersection of Gender-Related Facial Appearance and Facial Displays of Emotion (2015, background): “A recent theory for how stable personality inferences can be derived from expressive behaviors was put forth by Hareli and Hess (2010, 2012) suggesting that appraisals associated with emotion production can be reverse engineered in order to derive more stable trait inferences.”
How leaders' emotional displays shape followers' organizational citizenship behavior (2015, background): “In addition to emotional contagion, affective processes involve changes in impression formation and interpersonal liking (see e.g., Clark & Taraban, 1991; Hareli & Hess, 2010; Knutson, 1996).”
Feeling Mixed, Ambivalent, and in Flux: The Social Functions of Emotional Complexity for Leaders (2017, background): “Once followers perceive and discern a leader’s emotions, they will aim to understand the situation that elicited these emotions by “reverse engineering”—that is, reconstructing the relationship between the leader and the emotion-eliciting event based on the emotion expressed (Hareli & Hess, 2010).”
Teachers’ emotions and emotional authenticity: do they matter to students’ emotional responses in the classroom? (2020, background): “For example, when perceiving an emotional display such as laughter, individuals may automatically try to evaluate the others’ emotional state (McGettigan et al., 2015) or make inferences about their character (Hareli & Hess, 2010).”
The Interpersonal Dynamics of Emotion: Toward an Integrative Theory of Emotions as Social Information (2018, background): “These inferences often take the form of reverse appraisals (de Melo et al., 2011; Hareli & Hess, 2010), whereby observers use their emotion knowledge to infer from another person’s emotional expressions what has happened to that person and what their own role in the situation is.”