The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure

By Alexandra A. Cleland, Martin J. Pickering. 2003

394 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b865efa0867b2ed29ca546802d1e0b62222b483

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication (2006, background): “context of lexical or semantic repetition (Branigan et al., 2000; Cleland and Pickering, 2003; Schoonbaert et al., in press).”
The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming (2007, background): “Importantly, Pickering and Branigan’s (1998) account could also explain Cleland and Pickering’s (2003) observation of enhanced priming when prime and target employed semantically related head nouns (e.”
The development of shared syntax in second language learning* (2015, background): “Similarly, in alternations involving nouns (e.g., the red sheep vs. the sheep that is red), priming is stronger if prime and target both have the same head noun (sheep) than if they have different head nouns (Cleland & Pickering, 2003).”
Structural priming: a critical review. (2008, background): “This suggests that priming may be sensitive to a level of representation at which different types of adjuncts are distinguished or that semantic relatedness enhances structural priming (cf. Cleland & Pickering, 2003).”
Linguistic alignment between people and computers (2010, positive): “Similar alignment also occurs with other denotationally equivalent but syntactically distinct constructions (Cleland and Pickering, 2003; Haywood et al., 2005), and even between languages in bilinguals (Hartsuiker et al., 2004).”
Cross-linguistic structural priming in multilinguals: further evidence for shared syntax (2016, background): “…& Pickering, 2009; Bock, 1986), order of auxiliary and past participle (Hartsuiker & Westenberg, 2000), adjective + noun vs. noun + relative clause (Cleland & Pickering, 2003), omission vs. production of optional “that” (Ferreira, 2003), and low- or high attachment of relative clauses in a complex…”
Unraveling the Dyad: Using Recurrence Analysis to Explore Patterns of Syntactic Coordination Between Children and Caregivers in Conversation (2006, background): “Also, Cleland and Pickering (2003) found that participants can be primed to use certain noun-phrase structures given what occurs in ongoing dialogue (see Garrod & Pickering, 2004, for a review).”
Alignment in second language dialogue (2008, background): “…do not want to be associated with the same position (e.g., in courtroom trials in adversarial legal systems; Danet, 1980).2 But in addition, there is good evidence that alignment at one linguistic level enhances alignment at other levels (Branigan et al., 2000; Cleland & Pickering, 2003).”
Becoming syntactic. (2006, background): “Additional studies have demonstrated that repeated verbs (Branigan et al., 2000) and nouns (Cleland & Pickering, 2003) increase structural priming.”
Why is conversation so easy? (2004, background): “(e.g. ‘the diver giving the cake to the cricketer ’) or objects [ 31 ], and repeating syntax or closed-class lexical items in question-answering”
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue (2004, background): “Likewise, Cleland and Pickering (2003) found people tended to produce noun phrases like the sheep that’s red as opposed to the red sheep more often after hearing the goat that’s red than after the book that’s red.”
Lexical and syntactic representations in closely related languages: Evidence from Cantonese–Mandarin bilinguals (2011, background): “Note that a similar mechanism has been used to explain the semantic boost in monolingual production (Cleland & Pickering, 2003).”
The logic of syntactic priming and acceptability judgments (2016, neutral): “7 The lexical boost is not solely due to semantic similarity between prime and target, though such similarity enhances priming (Cleland and Pickering 2003): Cross-linguistic priming (see section 3.2) using translation-equivalent verbs is smaller than would be expected if the lexical boost resulted…”
A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production (2016, background): “, & Cleland, A.A. (1999). Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 635–640. Retrieved 2015-06-29, from http://link.springer.com/ article/10.3758/BF03212972. nigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., & Cleland, A.A. (2000, May). Syntactic co-ordinati”
Processing verb argument structure across languages: Evidence for shared representations in the bilingual lexicon (2007, neutral): “…of different languages (e.g., Hartsuiker & Westenberg, 2000; Pickering & Branigan, 1998; Scheepers, 2003), structures (e.g., Bock & Loebell, 1990; Cleland & Pickering, 2003; Smith & Wheeldon, 2001), tasks (e.g., Branigan, Pickering, & Cleland, 2000; Corley & Scheepers, 2002; Fox Tree & Meijer,…”