The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming

By Sofie Schoonbaert, Robert J. Hartsuiker, Martin J. Pickering. 2007

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56e97df23e87bfb663612d204e286423e1d78cf0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Cross-linguistic structural priming in multilinguals: further evidence for shared syntax (2016, methodology): “…of the bungalow that …) In order to generalize the findings to an alternation that corresponds to a difference in verb argument structure, Experiment 4 elicited double object and prepositional object datives, as did Cai et al. (2011), Kantola and Van Gompel (2011), and Schoonbaert et al. (2007).”
Alignment in second language dialogue (2008, background): “There is good evidence of cross-linguistic priming of syntactic choices, with speakers of two languages being more likely to use a particular construction in one language (eg, a passive) if they have just used or heard the equivalent construction in their other language (Hartsuiker, Pickering, & Vel”
Structural priming: a critical review. (2008, background): “Thus, Schoonbaert et al. (2007) found that Dutch L1 speakers were more likely to use an English prepositional-object construction after hearing an English prepositional-object construction than an English double-object construction (in dialogue).”
Lexical and syntactic representations in closely related languages: Evidence from Cantonese–Mandarin bilinguals (2011, methodology): “2a) assumes that such bilinguals have different lemmas for cognates, just as for noncognates, as assumed in Schoonbaert et al. (2007).”
Syntactic alignment and shared word order in code-switched sentence production: Evidence from bilingual monologue and dialogue (2010, background): “Factors known to influence alignment are, for instance, lexical overlap between prime-target picture pairs (e.g., Branigan et al., 2000; Schoonbaert et al., 2007) and the interactivity of the dialogue situation (e.”
The logic of syntactic priming and acceptability judgments (2016, unknown): “…has similar characteristics in natives and non-natives (e.g., occurring for the same constructions, and demonstrating the lexical boost; Cai et al. 2011; Flett, Branigan, and Pickering 2013; Kantola and van Gompel 2011; Salamoura and Williams 2006; Schoonbaert, Hartsuiker, and Pickering 2007).”
Testing convergence via code-switching: priming and the structure of variable subject expression (2011, background): “…Schoonbaer, Speybroeck, & Vanderelst, 2008; Pickering & Branigan, 1998; Szmrecsanyi, 2006), such that the repetition of yo leads to a stronger priming effect than from I to yo (though see Schoonbaert et al., 2007 on the role of translation-equivalent lexical items in cross-linguistic priming).”
Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: Testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children (2009, background): “…priming are now well attested in the literature and may go some way to explain the overacceptance and overproduction of overt subject pronouns in bilingual speakers of null-subject languages (Meijer and Fox Tree, 2003; Loebell and Bock, 2003; Hartsuiker et al., 2004; Schoonbaert et al., 2007).”
The development of shared syntax in second language learning* (2015, background): “…Hartsuiker & Pickering, 2012; Cai, Pickering, Yan & Branigan, 2011; Desmet & Declercq, 2006; Kantola & Van Gompel, 2011; Meijer & Fox Tree, 2003; Salamoura & Williams, 2006; 2007; Schoonbaert et al., 2007; Shin & Christianson, 2009; 2012; see Hartsuiker & Pickering, 2008 for an early review).”