The Dimensionality of Student Ratings of Instruction: What We Know and What We Do Not*
By Philip C. Abrami, Sylvia T. d'Apollonia, Steven Rosenfield. 2007
182 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38fcc77c12b108d700a8c23b66832e8ffa4276e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Steve Meyers
- John T. E. Richardson
- Michael D. Toland
- R. D. De Ayala
- Adela García-Aracil
- Paul Ginns
- Sari Lindblom-Ylänne
- Å. Diseth
Citations in the corpus
- A Multilevel Factor Analysis of Students’ Evaluations of Teaching (2005, methodology): “Abrami et al. subsequently conducted a second-order component analysis, which indicated that students’ ratings of teaching effectiveness did indeed measure a general instructional skill (GIS), therefore confirming the PC analysis that there was a global measure of instructional skill. The GIS consis”
- Do Your Students Care Whether you Care About Them? (2009, background): “There are many different types of evaluation forms, and Abrami, d’Apollina, and Rosenfield (1997) conducted a large-scale factor analysis to determine whether a common core of traits exists across these varied questionnaires.”
- Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature (2005, methodology): “It has, however, been described as a ‘ritual’ (Abrami et al., 1996, p. 213), and precisely for that reason it may not always be regarded as a serious matter by those involved.”