Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems Pay Off

By J. Lapidus. 2002

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being (2008, background): “This, as Appelbaum et al. (2000) argue, is likely to work best when involvement sits within an organizational context that fosters good communication, reward fairness and individual development.”
Perceptions of HR practices, person–organisation fit, and affective commitment: The moderating role of career stage (2018, methodology): “Measurement Instruments ability-motivation-opportunity (AMO) model (Appelbaum et al., 2000), and earlier studies and reviews on HPWP (Boselie et al., 2005; Combs et al., 2006; Den Hartog et al., 2013; Jiang et al., 2012), we included 14 HR practices that influence the ability (e.g., training),…”
Positive employee attitudes: How much human resource management do you need? (2013, methodology): “The USA manufacturing study of Appelbaum et al. (2000) provides the locus classicus in support of a positive linear relationship between the intensity of ‘high-performance work systems’ (HPWS: a configuration of HRM focusing on participation, skills and incentives) and measures of organizational…”