The Psychology of Stereotyping
By D. J. Schneider. 2003
700 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Cognitive Science & Psychology, Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Su Lin Blodgett
- Karsten Jonsen
- Tamar SzaboGendler
- R. Ewijk
- M. Théorêt
- R. Wilson
- Martha L. Maznevski
- Taezoon Park
In Cognitive Science & Psychology
In Social Sciences & Humanities
- Michael Chattalas
- Tamar SzaboGendler
- L. Ross
- Roxanne A. Donovan
- Robert Sim
- R. Ewijk
- Hanna M. Wallach
- Gilsinia Lopez
Citations in the corpus
- Stereotyping Norwegian Salmon: An Inventory of Pitfalls in Fairness Benchmark Datasets (2021, background): “which groups to consider or which aspects of stereotyping to focus on, including occupations, physical features, emotional traits, or language use (Schneider, 2005).”
- pErSpECTiVE TakiNg uNDErmiNES STErEOTypE maiNTENaNCE prOCESSES: EViDENCE frOm SOCial mEmOry, BEhaViOr ExplaNaTiON, aND iNfOrmaTiON SOliCiTaTiON (2012, background): “Accordingly, stereotypes serve as both descriptive lenses that guide perception and prescriptive shackles that limit opportunity (Schneider, 2005).”
- Gender stereotype endorsement and achievement-related outcomes: The role of competence beliefs and task values (2013, background): “Given that the study was conducted predominantly in low-socioeconomic areas, it is possible that students held different stereotypes than do students from more privileged areas (Lips, 2005; Schneider, 2004) and showed different patterns of achievement (see Sirin, 2005 for a meta-analysis).”
- The Association of Cognitive Ability with Right–Wing Ideological Attitudes and Prejudice: A Meta–Analytic Review (2015, background): “Mental or cognitive abilities, as related to ideological attitudes and prejudice, are strikingly absent from the comprehensive Handbook of Social Psychology (Fiske, Gilbert, & Lindzey, 2010), and from popular and widely used texts and textbooks that deal specifically with stereotyping, prejudice and”
- Assessing Tolerance for Wildlife: Clarifying Relations Between Concepts and Measures (2015, background): “The analogy becomes more useful when one considers that discriminatory behavior does not always involve behaviors designed to negatively affect a group of people, but can also be applied to behaviors that show a preference for a certain group of people (Schneider, 2004).”
- Toward a Greater Understanding of Antigay Prejudice: On the Role of Sexual Orientation and Gender Role Violation (2007, background): “In contrast, social psychologists have historically used the term prejudice to emphasize people’s more affective, hedonic reactions toward social groups and their implications for general attitudinal dimensions such as approachavoidance, good vs. bad, like vs. dislike, and so on (Schneider, 2004).”
- Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Practice (2011, neutral): “Schneider (2004), in a recent and comprehensive review of the matter, is optimistic, but notes that attempts to change racial attitudes often fail.”
- The impact of national stereotypes on the country of origin effect: A conceptual framework (2008, background): “Although there has been little empirical work on the origins of stereotype contents, most of our prevailing stereotype perceptions are formed based on a combination of at least some direct and indirect (i.e. through education or the media) experience with relevant national groups (Schneider, 2005).”
- Ageism: Prejudice Against Our Feared Future Self (2005, background): “The study of racism has been and continues to be a major focus of research (Nelson, 2002b; Plous, 2002; Schneider, 2004).”
- Determining Where the Wild Things will be: Using Psychological Theory to Find Tolerance for Large Carnivores (2014, background): “Linn (1965) defined prejudice as an attitude, reserving the term “discrimination” for overt behavior—that is behavior undertaken with the intent of impacting persons or groups of people that are the target of prejudicial attitudes (see Schneider 2004 for review).”