Determining Where the Wild Things will be: Using Psychological Theory to Find Tolerance for Large Carnivores
By Jeremy T. Bruskotter, R. Wilson. 2014
323 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c225e82ea3aad68c5ab50d9ee892dff4aaaff8d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Mike Letnic
- K. Moseby
- Chris R. Dickman
- W. Ripple
- Christopher N. Johnson
- Euan G. Ritchie
- L. Boitani
- M. Crowther
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Food habits of the world's grey wolves (2016, background): “Without such knowledge, management strategies for grey wolves may continue to be focussed on lowering perceived risks to humans and their activities, rather than also incorporating the benefits of grey wolves to human society and the environment (sensu Bruskotter & Wilson 2014).”
- Resolving the value of the dingo in ecological restoration (2015, background): “…the potential benefits of large carnivores, such as increased biodiversity, rangeland productivity, and associated increases in cattle live-weight or local tourism, rather than just their negative impacts, is critical to promoting such acceptance (Bruskotter & Wilson 2014; Prowse et al. 2014).”
- Restoring apex predators can reduce mesopredator abundances (2019, background): “, 2018), impacting on the acceptability of these species (Bruskotter and Wilson, 2014), particularly when their recovery occurs in human-dominated landscapes (Chapron et al.”