GROUP DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY: META‐ANALYSES COMPARING FIVE U.S. RACIAL GROUPS

By Hannah J. Foldes, Emily E. Duehr, Deniz S. Ones. 2008

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31c888d3fad6aad8485635800a20323353b8f801

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. P. D. Harms
2. M. Tynan
3. Marcus Crede
4. Michael Howe
5. S. Fatimah
6. Matthias Spitzmuller
7. Hock-Peng Sin
8. Michael T. Kalkbrenner

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. D. Harms
2. Michael Howe
3. Marcus Crede
4. S. Fatimah
5. Matthias Spitzmuller
6. Hock-Peng Sin
7. J. DeSimone

Citations in the corpus

• Investigating the Uniqueness and Usefulness of Proactive Personality in Organizational Research: A Meta-Analytic Review (2015, methodology): “This approach is consistent with previous meta-analytic work focused on examining subgroup differences in similar contexts (e.g., Foldes et al., 2008; Ones & Viswesvaran, 1998; Roth, Bevier, Bobko, Switzer Iii, & Tyler, 2001).”
• Much Ado About Grit: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis of the Grit Literature (2017, background): “…(Roberts, Walton, & Viechtbauer, 2006)—but prior findings from the personality literature (e.g., Costa, Terracciano, & McCrae, 2001; Foldes, Duehr, & Ones, 2008) suggest that differences across ethnicities and gender are likely to be more modest than those observed for ability…”