Corporate governance practices that address climate change: an exploratory study

By Jeremy Galbreath. 2009

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31aad617e79c44f291daece1de3a4ac317edd4f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Modeling the Impacts of Corporate Commitment on Climate Change (2012, background): “More broadly, the institutional system of governance in each country or region influences the degree to which measures to reduce GHG emissions are coercive and the consequent level of business autonomy (Griffiths et al., 2007; Brouhle and Harrington, 2009; Galbreath, 2010).”
The relevance of personal characteristics and gender diversity for (eco)-innovation activities at the firm-level: Results from a linked employer-employee database in Germany (2018, unknown): “Galbreath (2010) shows that firms with larger boards and younger directors perform better with respect to climate change issues.”
ESG performance and market value: the moderating role of employee board representation (2019, background): “CEO/chair role duality gives CEOs greater power, and may lead to CEOs disregarding further involvement in social and environmental activities (Galbreath, 2010).”
Corporate Board and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance: Evidence from China (2016, unknown): “Consistent with this argument, the prior study by Galbraith (2010) shows firms who separated the CEO-board chair role achieved better governance on climate change.”
Environmental policy, environmental performance, and financial distress in China: Do top management team characteristics matter? (2018, background): “…firm’s social/environmental management and financial performance (Ben-Amar and Mcllkenny, 2015; Chang et al., 2015; Eleftheriadis and Anagnostopoulou, 2015; Galbreath, 2010, 2017; Haque and Ntim, 2017; Jizi, 2017; Lau et al., 2016; McGuinness et al., 2017; Ntim, 2016; Sullivan and Gouldson, 2017).”
An Investigation of Voluntary Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting in a Market Governance System: Australian Evidence (2011, background): “Corporate governance relates to the development of long-term strategy in addition to information disclosure and transparency, and responses to strategic issues such as climate change (Galbreath, 2009). It also impacts on the uses to which organisational resources will be deployed (Galbreath, 2009; H”
The effect of DEFRA guidance on greenhouse gas (2014, methodology): “The ﬁ nal models were therefore estimated as follows: (2009), 3 (2010), 4 (2011), and a t are intercept variables that change from year to year.”
Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies (2017, background): “Nevertheless, companies also face issues coinciding with the indirect effects of climate change, such as climate regulation or changing consumer demands (Ernst and Young, 2010), which can positively or negatively affect business operations (Galbreath, 2010; Hoffman, 2006).”