Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities

By Charles Goodwin. 2007

844 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/318127a9e59f1a9acf86cfb0ad9620856aa869c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Appraising lexical bundles in mathematics classroom discourse: obligation and choice (2010, background): “Positioning can refer to physical positioning, as it does in the study of Goodwin (2007) of how parents and children physically position themselves while the children do mathematics homework, but more often positioning is used metaphorically to represent relationships.”
Engaging in Science: A Feeling for the Discipline (2016, background): “Evidence is possible through analyses of data from learners’ activities, such as of Sandra’s participation in class, wherein tools from multimodal and interactional analysis can be recruited to analyze affect (see C. Goodwin, 2007; Stivers & Sidnell, 2005).”
Lexical bundle analysis in mathematics classroom discourse: the significance of stance (2010, background): “Positioning can refer to physical positioning, as it does in Goodwin’s (2007) study of how parents and children physically position themselves while the children do mathematics homework, but more often positioning is used metaphorically to represent relationships.”
Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning (2009, background): “‘Positioning’ can refer to physical arrangements, as in Goodwin’s (2007) study of how parents and children position themselves while the children do mathematics homework, but more often, as with van Langenhove and Harré, ‘positioning’ is used metaphorically to represent relationships. Harré and van ”
Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective (2013, background): “…to a CA-framework by insisting that ‘participation’ means embodied situated actions of participants, involving dynamic (re-)negotiation and reconfiguration of spatial, attentional, epistemic and affective alignments of (multiple) participants (Goodwin and Goodwin, 2004; Goodwin, 2007a).”
Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations (2014, background): “…of their momentary relationship, the participants display their orientations to the social and moral order of their community and wider society (C. Goodwin 2007:70–71).2 Even if these three facets of the participants’ momentary relationship are all interwoven in single actions, the participants…”
Establishing Recipiency in Pre-Beginning Position in the Second Language Classroom (2009, neutral): “…(C. Goodwin, 1979, 1980, 1981), evaluations during descriptions (M. H. Goodwin, 1980), assessments (C. Goodwin & Goodwin, 1987), stance taking (C. Goodwin, 2007; Haddington, 2006), storytelling (Bavelas, Coates, & Johnson, 2002), as well as institutional interaction such as doctor– patient…”
Talk and Conceptual Change at Work: Adequate Representation and Epistemic Stance in a Comparative Analysis of Statistical Consulting and Teacher Workgroups (2012, background): “Adequate representations capture and support a “structure of intentionality” for valued activities of a local work group (Goodwin, 1994, p. 609), but they also support coordination across sites and other groups (Star & Griesemer, 1989).”