Nongovernmental organizations as institutional actors in international business: theory and implications

By Jonathan P. Doh, Hildy Teegen. 2002

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3039a16367b5fc75777919b6cfff2138d87e581c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Bridging the institutional divide: Partnerships in subsistence markets (2012, background): “…gaps in SMs, and are often active in community participation, the supply of education and health care, and contacts with government, 9 among others (Doh and Teegen, 2002),. Similarly, governments, particularly at the national level, can ensure institutional protection against unpredictable…”
Inclusive Networks for Building BOP Markets (2012, background): “The widespread emergence of partnerships, understood as arrangements between independent organizations to work together on a joint project (Doh & Teegen, 2002), is not the exclusive domain of the BOP (Astley, 1984).”
Resources and Governance in "Base of the Pyramid"-Partnerships: Assessing Collaborations between Businesses and Non-Business Actors (2014, background): “…the importance of non-traditional actor combinations involving actors well beyond the business sphere, such as CSOs (e.g., Dahan et al., 2010; Doh & Teegen, 2002; Rivera-Santos & Rufín, 2010c; Vachani, Doh, & Teegen, 2009; Webb et al., 2010) or government agencies (e.g.,van Marrewijk, Clegg,…”
The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: an international business research agenda (2004, background): “Doh and Teegen (2002) integrated stakeholder theory with institutional theory to support revision”
Institutional and strategic operations perspectives on manufacturing reshoring (2016, background): “Government variables are the formal norms or ‘rules of the game’, governance factors (Slangen and Beugelsdijk 2010) or formal agreements created by citizens (Doh and Teegen 2002).”
Is Corporate Responsibility Converging? A Comparison of Corporate Responsibility Reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany (2009, background): “More recently, research has examined the interaction of NGOs with MNCs (Doh and Teegen, 2002; Geppert et al., 2003; Keim, 2003).”
The Impact of NGO Network Conflict on the Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies of Multinational Corporations (2006, background): “These advocacy NGOs assume the role of voice of society, critiquing business or government policy formation or implementation (Doh & Teegen, 2002, 2003; Teegen, 2003).”
Under Positive Pressure (2016, background): “3.23 (1.61) 0.74 (before elimination: 0.68) We have to cope with NGOs campaigning against our firm/our products and services.”