Efficient Take‐Back Legislation

By Atalay Atasu, Luk N. Van Wassenhove, Miklos Sarvary. 2009

370 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3014ce3eb1068212a049c1e6093d0f9e2741d427

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Impact of subsidy policies on recycling and remanufacturing using system dynamics methodology: a case of auto parts in China (2014, methodology): “…subsidy policies on recycling and remanufacturing using system dynamics methodology: a case of auto parts in China, Journal of Cleaner Production (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.023 Webster and Mitra (2007) and Atasu et al. (2009) studied the efficiency of recycling regulations.”
Supply Chain Consequences of Subsidies for Corporate Social Responsibility (2015, background): “…(2012, 2013) consider the effectiveness of corporate incentives to encourage reduced consumer demand for electricity; Palmer and Walls (1997), Atasu et al. (2009), and Atasu and Van Was-senhove (2012) examine the market consequences of subsidies for waste disposal and recycling; and Sansing…”
Stakeholder Perspectives on E‐Waste Take‐Back Legislation (2013, methodology): “Atasu et al. (2009) and Quariguasi Frota Neto et al. (2008) analyzed the welfare and environmental implications of take-back legislation.”
The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption (2016, neutral): “For the most part, the subsidy design literature in green technologies has not studied demand uncertainty (see for example, Benthem et al. (2008), Atasu et al. (2009), Lobel and Perakis (2013) and Alizamir et al. (2013)).”
Bargaining framework for competitive green supply chains under governmental financial intervention (2011, methodology): “Nevertheless, differing from Atasu et al. (2009), who considered the potential of subsidizing producers for recycling, this work considers another taxation subsidy scenario in which governments levy green taxes on producers and subsidize RL-suppliers (Luk, 2005).”
Promoting electric automobiles: supply chain analysis under a government’s subsidy incentive scheme (2013, background): “For example, Atasu et al. (2009) constructed an economic model to examine the extended producer responsibility from a social planner’s (government’s) perspective.”
Extended Producer Responsibility for E‐Waste: Individual or Collective Producer Responsibility? (2012, background): “…Walther and Spengler 2005), recycling competition (Toyasaki et al. 2010), recovery process design (Zuidwijk and Krikke 2008), supply chain conﬁgura-tion (Jacobs and Subramanian 2012), and the social welfare and environmental implications of such laws (Atasu et al. 2009, Quariguasi et al. 2008).”
Environmental Taxes and the Choice of Green Technology (2013, background): “Several authors address the product take-back legislation (e.g., Atasu et al. 2009, Atasu and Subramanian 2009).”
Competitive Quality Choice and Remanufacturing (2014, methodology): “Among others, Ferguson and Toktay (2006) and Atasu et al.”
Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations (2012, background): “Atasu et al. (2009) discussed the economic and environmental impacts of the EPR-type of legislation and identified efficiency conditions.”
How Does Product Recovery Affect Quality Choice? (2013, methodology): “We use a single, aggregate measure of environmental impact per unit at each stage of the life cycle, for simplicity, as in Atasu et al. (2009a) and others.”
Product Reuse in Innovative Industries (2013, background): “For example, Atasu et al. (2011) capture environmental impact using a simple unit “cost” of uncollected used products, and Atasu et al. (2009) deﬁne a simple “cost to the environment” parameter, the determination of which is assumed to be outside the scope of their model.”
Impact of Take‐Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry (2017, methodology): “Furthermore, as in Majum-der and Groenevelt (2001), Ferguson and Toktay (2006), and Atasu et al. (2009), we assume the OEM and IR engage in Cournot competition in the market.”