Competitive Quality Choice and Remanufacturing

430 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impact of Take‐Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry (2017, methodology): “Such single-period, steady-state models have been frequently used in recent remanufacturing (e.g., Gal-breth et al. 2013, € Orsdemir et al. 2014) and take-back regulation literature (e.g., Atasu et al. 2009, Jacobs and Subramanian 2012).”
Cooperative game approaches to coordinating a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns (2019, result): “This assumption is consistent with existing research and has been widely used in literature (Örsdemir et al., 2014; Xiong et al., 2013; Yan et al., 2015; Zou et al., 2016).”
The Role of Perceived Quality Risk in Pricing Remanufactured Products (2017, background): “…Swaminathan 2006), marketing strategies (e.g., Atasu et al. 2008, Oraiopoulos et al. 2012), impact of remanufacturing on new product design (Atasu and Souza 2013, Galbreth et al. 2013, Orsdemir et al. 2014, Subramanian et al. 2013), and production capacity (Vorasayan and Ryan 2006), among others.”
On the Competition between Two Modes of Product Recovery: Remanufacturing and Refurbishing (2019, background): “Orsdemir et al. (2014) consider both the quantity and quality decisions of an OEM when facing competition from an independent remanufacturer.”