Environmental Taxes and the Choice of Green Technology
By Dmitry Krass, Timur Nedorezov, Anton Ovchinnikov. 2013
770 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fc1c3f111afb58f53f5f5f9cc24a41d8cd40a63
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Joint decisions on inventory replenishment and emission reduction investment under different emission regulations (2014, background): “[38], taking a firm’s perspective to analyze the effects of investment decisions on the profitability and carbon emissions.”
- Optimal electric vehicle production strategy under subsidy and battery recycling (2017, methodology): “The newsvendor model, which was pioneered by Edgeworth (1888), has been extensively studied in the literature (Babich, 2010; Cohen et al., 2016; Krass et al., 2013; Qin et al., 2011).”
- Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation (2014, neutral): “Krass et al. (2010) consider the case in which the environmental regulator as a Stackelberg leader firstly decides the tax level and the firm as a follower selects emission control technology, production quantity and price.”
- The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation (2019, background): “By incorporating positive externality from sustainability innovation, subsidy, firms’ profits, and consumer surplus, as commonly defined in the literature (Krass et al., 2013; Raz & Ovchinnikov, 2015), the government’s objective function can be expressed as follows: ππGG = ααee − Φ + ππMM + ππRR + D”
- Promoting electric automobiles: supply chain analysis under a government’s subsidy incentive scheme (2013, background): “…found that the investment and production subsidies for a firm may increase the emissions potential of the firm’s optimal capacity portfolio, and Krass et al. (2012) showed that increasing the environmental tax to a sufficiently high level may discourage a firm from adopting a greener…”