How Does Product Recovery Affect Quality Choice?

By Atalay Atasu, Gilvan C. Souza. 2013

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e849a4440af62b6412175c7a2ffe454e7b8b9160

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

On the Competition between Two Modes of Product Recovery: Remanufacturing and Refurbishing (2019, background): “(The OEM’s quality choice has been considered in the context of remanufacturing by Atasu and Souza (2013), Ors-demir et al. (2014)).”
Product Reuse in Innovative Industries (2013, background): “For example, Atasu and Souza (2011) quantify environmental impact as a function of optimal consumption (demand) as well as recovery rates.”
Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Critical Review, and Future Research (2013, background): “This yields s∗ = 1/3c, and p∗ = 2/9c. Atasu and Souza (2012) introduce product recovery, so that a fraction τ of total demand q is taken back at a collection cost α(τq)2, either as a result of take-back legislation or as a profitable activity, and used in the production of the new product as…”
Competitive Quality Choice and Remanufacturing (2014, methodology): “The unit variable cost of producing a new product with quality level s is b s 2 where b is a scaling parameter and does not alter our insights (e.g., Atasu and Souza 2011, Desai 2001, Moorthy 1988).”
Distribution Channel Choice and Divisional Conflict in Remanufacturing Operations (2020, background): “…be applied to the cases where similar products are introduced to the market repeatedly (Savas-kan et al. 2004) or where a product’s life cycle has reached its maturity stage so that prices and recovery rates are stable (e.g., Atasu and Souza 2013, Savaskan et al. 2004, Zikopoulos and Tagaras 2007).”
Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future (2015, unknown): “…2009; Amin & Zhang, 2012a; Amin & Zhang, 2012b; Ao, Xu-ping, Bo-jie, & Wu-wei, 2007; Aras & Aksen, 2008; Atasu, Guide, & Van Wassenhove, 2010; Atasu & Souza, 2012; Atasu, Toktay, & Van Wassenhove, 2013; Atasu, Van Wassenhove, & Sarvary, 2009; Barbosa-Póvoa, 2009; Benedito & Corominas, 2013;…”
Stakeholder Perspectives on E‐Waste Take‐Back Legislation (2013, background): “…Subramanian 2011, Esenduran and Kemahlioglu-Ziya 2011), the choice of cost sharing models in collective systems, product design implications of alternative take-back law implementations (Atasu and Souza 2011, Plambeck and Wang 2009) and the impact of recycling competition (Toyasaki et al. 1999).”
The Role of Perceived Quality Risk in Pricing Remanufactured Products (2017, background): “…and Swaminathan 2006), marketing strategies (e.g., Atasu et al. 2008, Oraiopoulos et al. 2012), impact of remanufacturing on new product design (Atasu and Souza 2013, Galbreth et al. 2013, Orsdemir et al. 2014, Subramanian et al. 2013), and production capacity (Vorasayan and Ryan 2006), among…”