Marketplace and personal space: Investigating the differential effects of attachment style across relationship contexts

By Matthew Thomson, Allison R. Johnson. 2006

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f3e39add80c0f290349a19bb0b271c04bf49288

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Arnold Japutra
2. Y. Ekinci
3. Lyndon Simkin
4. Jodie Whelan
5. Insin Kim
6. Allison R. Johnson
7. Matthew Thomson
8. Sunghyup Sean Hyun

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Arnold Japutra
2. Lyndon Simkin
3. Y. Ekinci
4. Jodie Whelan
5. Insin Kim
6. Allison R. Johnson
7. N. Dawar
8. Ruth N. Bolton

In Social Psychology

1. Jodie Whelan
2. Arnold Japutra
3. Y. Ekinci
4. Lyndon Simkin
5. N. Dawar
6. Allison R. Johnson
7. Matthew Thomson
8. Sunghyup Sean Hyun

Citations in the corpus

• Identifying Optimal Rapport-Building Behaviors In Inducing Patrons’ Emotional Attachment In Luxury Restaurants (2014, background): “Recently, scholars (e.g., Thomson & Johnson, 2006) have postulated that emotional attachment can be extended beyond such close relationships with other people.”
• Consumer-Retailer Emotional Attachment: Some Antecedents and the Moderating Role of Attachment Anxiety (2010, unknown): “Recent marketing research supports the application of attachment theory in marketing (Thomson and Johnson, 2006).”
• Why brands should fear fearful consumers: How attachment style predicts retaliation (2012, methodology): “Thomson and Johnson (2006) find that avoidance and anxiety predict consumers' pattern of commitment, involvement, and satisfaction when they are in consumption relationships with brands and service providers.”
• Positive and negative behaviours resulting from brand attachment: The moderating effects of attachment styles (2018, background): “Thomson and Johnson (2006) showed that attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance style indirectly influence satisfaction through reciprocity.”
• Attributions of blame following a product-harm crisis depend on consumers’ attachment styles (2016, background): “Though a number of marketing articles support parallels between interpersonal attachments and brand attachments (Johnson et al. 2012; Mende and Bolton 2011; Mende et al. 2013; Paulssen 2009; Swaminathan et al. 2009; Thomson and Johnson 2006), unique aspects of brand Mark Lett (2016) 27:285–294 287”
• Decoding Customer–Firm Relationships: How Attachment Styles Help Explain Customers' Preferences for Closeness, Repurchase Intentions, and Changes in Relationship Breadth (2013, background): “Second, Thomson and Johnson (2006) conduct a crosssectional survey of 118 undergraduate students to study general attachment styles—that is, a person’s attachment anxiety and avoidance toward other people in general.”