CLEANING UP THE BIG MUDDY: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF THE DETERMINANTS OF ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The entrepreneurial earnings puzzle: Mismeasurement or real? (2014, background): “Honoring sunk costs is a pervasive phenomenon, as shown in the review by Sleesman et al. (2012), and this may contribute to sustained poor performance of entrepreneurs.”
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions (2017, background): “Lewandowski (2016), claim that circular business models are widely seen at the core of CE.”
Top Ten Behavioral Biases in Project Management: An Overview (2021, background): “It was first described by Staw (1976) with later work by Brockner (1992), Staw (1997), Sleesman et al. (2012), and Drummond (2014, 2017).”
Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies (2019, background): “A fail-safe N criteria of 0.05, as opposed to 0.00, represents a more stringent test for the fail-safe N number (Sleesman, Conlon, McNamara, & Miles, 2012).”
A Review of Cognitive Dissonance Theory in Management Research (2017, methodology): “Following this approach, management researchers adopted CDT and Aronson’s (1969) extension to explain escalation of commitment under the label self-justification theory to suggest that decision makers experience dissonance in response to negative information about their decision(s) because this conf”