Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Online Courses
By Doris U. Bolliger. 2004
543 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2be9f3cf41f5bc6a95710f6b347363a344f0b922
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Hasnan Baber
- Yu-Chun Kuo
- Patsy D. Moskal
- Charles D. Dziuban
- Brian R. Belland
- Oksana Wasilik
- Andrew E. Walker
- Jessica Thompson
Citations in the corpus
- Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcome and Satisfaction in Online Learning during the Pandemic of COVID19 (2020, background): “Bolliger, Supanakorn, and Boggs (2010) stated that motivation is an important factor to keep students satisfied in an online classroom setup.”
- Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education (2009, background): “Bolliger and Martindale (2004) identified three key factors central to online student satisfaction: the instructor, technology, and interactivity.”
- Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses (2014, background): “Findings from several studies indicate student satisfaction is related to a number of factors such as interaction, types of support, student autonomy, technology, self-efficacy, and self-regulation (Artino, 2007; 10 Bolliger & Martindale, 2004; Reinhart & Schneider, 2001; Sahin, 2007).”
- Student Satisfaction with Online Learning: Is It a Psychological Contract?. (2015, background): “Often, in addressing these concerns students’ perceptions of their course experience becomes a surrogate for learning engagement in the context of satisfaction (Swan, 2001; Arbaugh, 2001; Richardson & Swan, 2003; Bolliger, 2004).”