The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research
By J. L. Pierce, T. Kostova, Kurt T. Dirks. 2003
1,931 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b2dc05a7b78c8cd01249149bf49bea2a67c33ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Marko Sarstedt
- Joseph F. Hair
- Martin Schreier
- Nan (Andy) Zhang
- Elena Karahanna
- Sean Xin Xu
- Christoph Fuchs
- Suzanne B. Shu
In Social Psychology
- S. Hannah
- He Peng
- Sanjay Kumar Singh
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Douglas R. May
- Bernadette Kamleitner
- Silvia Feuchtl
- Joann Peck
In Sociology and Political Science
- Martin Schreier
- Marko Sarstedt
- Sanjay Kumar Singh
- Joseph F. Hair
- Bernadette Kamleitner
- Silvia Feuchtl
- Joann Peck
- Suzanne B. Shu
Citations in the corpus
- Counterproductive Work Behavior Among Chinese Knowledge Workers (2012, neutral): “‘Much like the overly possessive child, individuals may be unwilling to share the target of ownership with others or may feel a need to retain exclusive control over it’ (Pierce et al., 2003, p. 101).”
- Moral Maturation and Moral Conation: A Capacity Approach to Explaining Moral Thought and Action (2011, background): “Pierce et al. (2003) propose that individuals hold varying levels of psychological ownership for various aspects of their environment, or what they call “targets.””
- Egocentric Categorization and Product Judgment: Seeing Your Traits in What You Own (and Their Opposite in What You Don’t) (2013, background): “Next, experiment 3 extends the empirical support for the framework to include situations of psychological (vs. legal) ownership, defined as a sense of possession prior to purchase (Pierce, Kostova, and Dirks 2003).”
- In Search of a Surrogate for Touch: The Effect of Haptic Imagery on Perceived Ownership (2013, background): “Pierce et al. (2003) suggest that the direct physical control of objects that is afforded by touch may be an antecedent of perceived ownership.”
- Toward an Understanding of the Psychology of Stewardship (2012, background): “A sense of psychological ownership imbues individuals with the internal drive to protect that which is psychologically owned (Avey et al., 2009; Pierce et al., 2003).”
- Failure or voluntary exit? Reassessing the female underperformance hypothesis (2015, background): “Ownership feelings are associated withenhancedaffectivecommitmenttowardtheownershiptarget(Aveyetal.,2009;Mayhewetal.,2007;Pendletonetal.,1998)and with a stronger intention to stay with it (Avey et al., 2009; Pierce et al., 2003; Wagner et al., 2003).”
- Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications for Research in Marketing (2015, positive): “In the following sections, we stick to extant construct elaboration by Pierce, Kostova, and Dirks (2001, 2003), which does not make a clear distinction between the sense of possession and the extended-self experience.”
- Access-Based Services as Substitutes for Material Possessions: The Role of Psychological Ownership (2020, background): “Possession largely stems from a sense of having altered the environment and causing something to happen (Pierce, Kostova, and Dirks 2003).”
- Transformational leadership, employee engagement and performance: Mediating effect of psychological ownership (2011, background): “Psychological ownership can be measured, developed and invested in individuals; this study shows citizenship behavior support through dimensions of self efficacy, belongings, self identity and accountability (Pierce et al., 2003).”
- Why and when do people hide knowledge? (2013, background): “Psychological ownership can satisfy an individual's efficacy and effectance needs (Pierce et al., 2003).”
- Territoriality in Organizations (2005, background): “Pierce et al. (2001, 2003) argue that psychological ownership has its “roots” in three fundamental human drives that provide the reasons for why individuals experience psychological ownership.”