Measures of five aspects of affective well-being at work

By Kevin Daniels. 2000

357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a95d7ec695b6ec84acbaa2e4f91abf4d171fa37

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Optimism predicting employees' creativity: The mediating role of positive affect and the positivity ratio (2012, positive): “For assessing positive and negative affect at work, 18 items proposed by Daniels ( 2000 ) for measuring affective well-being were used.”
On the Discriminant Validity of Burnout, Depression and Anxiety: A Re-examination of the Burnout Measure (2003, background): “The identification of this construct partly replicates Daniels’ (2000) finding in that he found tiredness-vigor to be a distinct aspect of affective well-being at work.”
Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach (2018, background): “Daniels (2000), capitalizing on Warr’s (1999) theory and integrating further contributions from the organisational literature, provided empirical support for a five-factor model of work-related affective well-being (i.e., anxiety-comfort, depression-pleasure, bored-enthusiastic, tiredness-vigour,…”
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research (2014, neutral): “Comfort with changes refers to the degree to which employees are comfortable with the changes brought about by the frequent upgrades (Daniels 2000, Simmons 2001).”
The structure of occupational well-being: A study among Dutch teachers (2004, background): “Research on the structure of emotions and mood has shown that affective well-being consists of several different major classes of affective experience, such as anxiety–comfort, depression–pleasure, boredom–enthusiasm, tiredness–vigour and anger–placidity (Daniels, 2000).”
Vigor as a Positive Affect at Work: Conceptualizing Vigor, Its Relations with Related Constructs, and Its Antecedents and Consequences (2011, background): “For example, Daniels (2000), following the bipolar view of affective wellbeing at work, measured vigor by the items of active, alert and full of energy, and tiredness by the three items of tired, fatigued, and sleepy, but then reverse-scored the three tiredness items and averaged all six items to…”
The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire. (2014, neutral): “19 Maslach, & Jackson, 1996], Warr-Daniels Affective Wellbeing Scales [WDAS & WDDS: Warr, 1990; Daniels, 2000; Mäkikangas, Feldt, & Kinnunen, 2007].”
Multiple Commitments: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Investigation in a Community Health Service Trust (2002, methodology): “…2.051 1.166 % explained variance 41.218 15.835 10.257 5.828 Cum % explained variance 41.218 57.053 67.309 73.137 study provides support for the notion that emotion is a complex construct, comprising different subconstructs (cf. Daniels, 2000) rather than a single construct (cf. Parkinson, 1995).”
Perceptions of Organizational Virtuousness and Happiness as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (2010, methodology): “Daniels (2000) proposed an AWB at work construct comprising five bi-polar dimensions: anxiety–comfort, depression–pleasure, boredom–enthusiasm, tiredness–vigor, and anger–placidity.”
Linking Work Events, Affective States, and Attitudes: An Empirical Study of Managers' Emotions (2004, methodology): “This set was taken from Daniels (2000), who developed and validated a five-factor”