The Development of Corporate Charitable Contributions in the UK: A Stakeholder Analysis

By Stephen Brammer, A. Millington. 2004

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/295af7452126cd29d9d6ca26c3504e5909636836

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Seeking Legitimacy Through CSR: Institutional Pressures and Corporate Responses of Multinationals in Sri Lanka (2015, unknown): “is argued that today these are influenced more by the needs and requirements of other powerful stakeholders (Brammer and Millington 2004; Veser 2004), including the state (Zhao 2012).”
Corporate Philanthropic Giving, Advertising Intensity, and Industry Competition Level (2010, background): “Numerous studies have documented firm characteristics that affect donation decisions, i.e., whether or not to donate, and the amount of donations (Brammer and Millington, 2004, 2005; Campbell and Slack, 2006; Coffey and Wang, 1998; Wang and Coffey, 1992).”
Environmental, Social, Governance Activities and Firm Performance: Evidence from China (2021, background): “Only about 10% of studies believed that there is a significant negative correlation between ESG activities and firm performance [13,14,35,42].”
A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance (2016, background): “This view was confirmed by many empirical studies conducted in different contexts, such as Barnett and Salomon (2006), Bhattacharya and Sen (2003), Brammer and Millington (2004), and Godfrey et al. (2009).”
What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility (2012, unknown): “Scholars have investigated moderators, including financial performance (Brammer & Millington, 2004; Johnson & Greening, 1999; McGuire, Sundgren, & Schneeweis, 1988; Turban & Greening, 1997), slack resources (Bansal, 2003; Graves & Waddock, 1994; Waddock & Graves, 1997a), and lower debt levels…”
Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response and Ownership Type: Evidence from Chinese Firms’ Response to the Sichuan Earthquake (2009, background): “Prior studies on corporate charitable giving (Adams and Hardwick, 1998; Amato and Amato, 2007; Brammer and Millington, 2004, 2005) normally examine firms’ general giving without providing clues on where the giving goes.”
Does financial resource slack drive sustainability expenditure in developing economy small and medium-sized enterprises? (2017, background): “3.1 Financial resource slack and sustainability expenditure From a slack resource theory perspective, greater financial slack is expected to drive greater financial support for social and environmental sustainability causes (Adams and Hardwick, 1998; Brammer and Millington, 2004).”
Shame on Who? The Effects of Corporate Irresponsibility and Social Performance on Organizational Reputation (2019, unknown): “In doing so, organizations may achieve enhanced corporate social performance (CSP) and be perceived favourably (Barnett and Salomon, 2012; Brammer and Millington, 2004).”
Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub‐Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis (2013, methodology): “CSR expenditure as a percentage of firm size, equity, as well as its natural log, are frequently used measures in the literature (Amato and Amato, 2007; Brammer and Millington, 2004, 2008; Navarro, 1988; Wang, Choi, and Li, 2008).”
Corporate charitable giving, multinational companies and countries of concern (2009, unknown): “Corporate charitable contributions are the subject of a growing literature much of which emphasises their strategic role in the management of rising pressures on companies to demonstrate their responsiveness to a wide range of stakeholders in society (Porter and Kramer, 2002; Saiia, Carroll and Buch”
Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm (2005, unknown): “…Jawahar and McLaughlin, 2001; McWilliams and Siegel, 2001; Winn and Keller, 2001; Friedman and Miles, 2002; Kassinis and Vafeas, 2002; Mahon, 2002; Orts and Strudler, 2002; Windsor, 2002; Kaler, 2003; Phillips et al., 2003; Ryan and Schneider, 2003; Brammer and Millington, 2004; McLaren, 2004).”