Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Corporate governance and dividend pay-out policy in UK listed SMEs: The effects of corporate board characteristics (2017, unknown): “The outcome hypothesis suggests that board diversity can improve board independence and effectiveness by bringing diverse ideas, perspectives and experience to the board (Asher et al., 2005; Carter et al., 2003; Tsuji, 2012).”
Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance (2012, unknown): “In property rights theory, the relevant stakeholders are defined as all investors who create transaction- and/or firm-specific property under the reasonable expectation of a return on investment through interaction with the firm (Aguilera and Jackson, 2003; Asher et al., 2005; Blair, 1995).”
The "Triple Depreciation Line" instead of the "Triple Bottom Line": Towards a genuine integrated reporting (2015, background): “This discussion goes also beyond the scope of this paper, but the interested reader can consult Asher et al. (2005), Circo (2009), Donaldson and Preston (1995) or Grinlinton (2011).”
Integrating Insights From the Resource-Based View of the Firm Into the New Stakeholder Theory (2021, background): “This means that entrepreneurial opportunity may be linked both to the past and to “unknown unknowns” about the future (Alvarez & Barney, 2007). The psychological and social processes that lead critical stakeholders to envision how resources can be recombined fruitfully away from old uses into new or”