Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory

By N. Hoffart. 2000

19,512 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28658b555ee49d187c21ea6cabbbdeefafdb65ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Conceptualizing Recovery Capital: Expansion of a Theoretical Construct (2008, methodology): “We utilized a grounded theory approach (Strauss and Corbin, 1998) through which we developed our theory of recovery.”
Spirituality and Leadership: An Empirical Review of Definitions, Distinctions, and Embedded Assumptions (2005, unknown): “Thematic categories surfaced from the data as the researchers used an inductive process often called bopen codingQ (Strauss & Corbin, 1998) to immerse themselves in the data, discuss and debate among themselves, and be open for patterns and themes to come in to view.”
Impact of dual executive leadership dynamics in creative organizations (2009, background): “…was accomplished in a traditional grounded theory manner searching for repeated themes (Bryman, 2004; Bryman et al., 1996; Coffey & Atkinson, 1996; Strauss & Corbin, 1998), crossing and comparing cases searching for patterns (Eisenhardt, 1989a; Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007; Yin, 2003) and finally,…”
Ambivalence and Resistance: A Study of Management in a Concertive Control System (2005, methodology): “For the data analysis for this study, we used a revised version of Glaser and Strauss’s constant comparison method (1967; see also Charmaz, 2000; Strauss & Corbin, 1998).”
Towards an environmental education without scientific knowledge: an attempt to create an action model based on children's experiences, emotions and perceptions about their environment (2011, methodology): “The data analysis included the three stages of the grounded theory's coding procedure: open coding, axial coding and selective coding (Strauss and Corbin 1998 ).”
Why Do Teachers Not Practice What They Believe Regarding Technology Integration? (2008, methodology): “During the data collection, I refined my data-collection processes by constantly making comparisons and by generating concept-related questions (Strauss & Corbin, 1998).”
Teachers' Beliefs About English Language Learners in the Mainstream Classroom: A Review of the Literature (2011, methodology): “I analyzed the articles in the review qualitatively by initially using Strauss and Corbin's (1990 ) open coding system to write down any of my thoughts as I read the articles.”
The Scientometrics of Social Entrepreneurship and Its Establishment as an Academic Field1 (2018, background): “…the evolving theory and based on the concept of “making comparisons,” whose purpose is to go to places, people, or events that will maximize opportunities to discover variations among concepts and to densify categories in terms of their properties and dimensions” (Strauss and Corbin, 1998, p. 201).”
Micro-Institutional Affordances and Strategies of Radical Innovation (2011, methodology): “The qualitative research procedures relied on iterative comparison and systematic coding of critical episodes along innovation trajectories (Eisenhardt, 1989; Strauss & Corbin, 1998).”
Gamification for Engaging Computer Science Students in Learning Activities: A Case Study (2014, methodology): “ined using an open coding scheme [47], [48].”
Delineating the Ways That Key Institutional Agents Provide Racial Minority Students With Access to Social Capital in College (2012, methodology): “Data analysis began immediately after the first interview was completed, and was conducted using methods prescribed by Moustakas (1994) and Strauss and Corbin (1998).”
Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. (2008, background): “Structure is defined within the context of grounded theory analysis as ‘the circumstances in which problems, issues, happenings, or events pertaining to a phenomenon are situated or arise’ (Strauss & Corbin 1998, p. 127).”
Visitors' Perceptions of a Trail Environment and Effects on Experiences: A Model for Nature-Based Recreation Experiences (2009, methodology): “Data analyses for this qualitative study involved constant comparison with both the journals and interview transcriptions and content analysis of the photos based on recommendations by Strauss and Corbin (1998) and Henderson (2006).”
Development of a Sense of Belonging for Privileged and Minoritized Students: An Emergent Model (2016, methodology): “In alignment with our epistemological framework, we drew largely upon constructivist grounded theory methods as described by Charmaz (2006), who built upon, but also diverged from, earlier and more objectivist grounded theory writings (c.f., Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Strauss & Corbin, 1990, 1998).”
The Socialization of Emotion: Learning Emotion Management at the Fire Station (2005, methodology): “Once data collection was complete, the authors used constant comparative analysis to identify recurrent issues and experiences identified in the participants’ comments and authors’ field observations (Strauss & Corbin, 1998).”
Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of Students’ Science Misconceptions: Implications for Practice and Teacher Education (2008, methodology): “Qualitative data analysis is a cyclical process (Mason 1996; Strauss and Corbin 1990).”