Time Pressure Promotes Work Engagement Test of Illegitimate Tasks as Boundary Condition
By Antje Schmitt, Sandra Ohly, Nina Kleespies. 2015
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27bd04161b7995357cbe0ec52a447e0a31cb2ae2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Rolf van Dick
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Tim Vahle-Hinz
- Julia Schulte-Braucks
- Anja Baethge
- François Courcy
- Anis Khedhaouria
- Francesco Montani
In Social Psychology
- Tim Vahle-Hinz
- Julia Schulte-Braucks
- Rolf van Dick
- Anja Baethge
- François Courcy
- Anis Khedhaouria
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Francesco Montani
In Sociology and Political Science
- Rolf van Dick
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Tim Vahle-Hinz
- Anja Baethge
- François Courcy
- Anis Khedhaouria
- Francesco Montani
- Roy Thurik
Citations in the corpus
- A matter of time? Challenging and hindering effects of time pressure on work engagement (2018, methodology): “The proposed inverted U-shaped relation between time pressure and work engagement was supported in a cross-sectional study (Schmitt et al., 2015) and a diary study across 10 days (Reis et al., 2017).”
- Time pressure and team member creativity within R&D projects: The role of learning orientation and knowledge sourcing (2017, result): “This is indeed consistent with prior research on time pressure, which reveals that the quantitative job demand can be appraised as both demanding and challenging (Schmitt et al., 2015).”
- Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness (2020, background): “For instance, Schmitt et al. (2015) found a curvilinear relationship between time pressure and work engagement.”