More on interlingual homograph recognition: language intermixing versus explicitness of instruction

By Ton Dijkstra, E. D. Bruijn, Herbert Schriefers, S. T. Brinke. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2000

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26d182fbcda391383ce740d3cb5ddd9c222e2beb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Interlingual homograph interference in German–English bilinguals: Its modulation and locus of control (2002, background): “Unlike Dijkstra et al. (1998), Dijkstra et al. (2000) and de Groot et al. (2000), we expected our participants to show IH interference even in the absence of pure non-target language words.”
The development of lexical fluency in a second language (2002, background): “Furthermore, these effects appear to be driven in a bottom-up manner so that they are relatively uninfluenced by factors such as instruction about which language is likely to appear (Dijkstra et al., 2000).”
Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context (2006, background): “Furthermore, evidence of non-selectivity persists irrespective of task instructions or participant’s expectations or knowledge that they will be presented with words from multiple languages (Dijkstra et al., 2000; Dijkstra & Van Hell, 2003; Dijkstra et al., 1998).”
Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages (2007, methodology): “, Beauvillain & Grainger, 1987; Dijkstra et al., 1998) and cognates, words that share both form and meaning across languages (e.g., Dijkstra et al., 1999; Lemhöfer, Dijkstra, & Michel, 2004). If bilinguals are able to function in one language alone, then their performance should resemble that of mon”
Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograph naming (2002, background): “…language appear on the stimulus list and have to be rejected as nonwords in the target language, longer latencies are found on homographs than on controls (Dijkstra et al., 1998(a), Experiment 2; De Groot et al., 2000, Experiment 3; Dijkstra et al., 2000, Part 2; von Studnitz and Green, 2002).”