Testing for Multigroup Invariance Using AMOS Graphics: A Road Less Traveled
By Barbara M. Byrne. 2004
1,068 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25e80b49c3546876eaed9b1437ffe7cac32ca00f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Management Science and Operations Research
- K. Naumann
- K. Kaplanidou
- Deniz Canel Çınarbaş
- Caroline F. Mansfield
- Jeremy S. Wolter
- J. Bowden
- Jascha de Nooijer
- R. Hood
Citations in the corpus
- Development and validation of the job crafting scale (2012, methodology): “To construct the items for this dimension, we adapted Dutch validated scales that are used to measure the occurrence of specific job resources (Bakker, Demerouti, Taris, Schaufeli, & Schreurs, 2003; Bakker, Demerouti, & Verbeke, 2004) such that they measured whether the participant took the initiati”
- Does habit strength moderate the intention–behaviour relationship in the Theory of Planned Behaviour? The case of fruit consumption (2007, methodology): “In order to investigate interaction effects using structural equation modelling, a multi-group approach can be used to investigate if values for parameters vary across categorical variables (Byrne, 2004; Kline, 2005).”
- Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures (2009, neutral): “As the models are nested, the difference in the fit between the chi squared values of the two models is itself chi squared distributed, with number of degrees of freedom equal to the difference between the degrees of freedom of the competing models (see Byrne, 2004).”
- Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects (2016, neutral): “…negative correlation was found between procrastination at work and mental demands in the Turkish sample ( r = − 0.17 Multi-group analyses were conducted on M 2 in order to examine whether the parameters of this particular model were invariant across the Dutch and the Turkish samples (Byrne, 2004).”
- Comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness at work: Construct validity of a scale measuring work-related sense of coherence (2013, methodology): “According to Byrne (2004), it is important to assess that a construct has the same theoretical structure for each group studied and to test for multiple group invariance.”
- Confidence to Manage Learning: The Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning of Early Adolescents with Learning Disabilities (2010, background): “97 in the LD group, all above the minimum CFI threshold proposed by Byrne (2004). The root mean square errors of approximation (RMSEAs) ranged from .”
- Openness and ambiguity intolerance: Their differential relations to well-being in the context of an academic life transition (2009, methodology): “This analysis was followed by another test with all parameters fixed to be invariant across groups (Byrne, 2004).”
- Fear of Death and Supernatural Beliefs: Developing A New Supernatural Belief Scale to Test the Relationship (2013, methodology): “To cross-validate M5(7) across the two independent samples, we examined measurement invariance between them (Byrne, 2004; Reise, Widaman, & Pugh, 1993; Schmitt & Kuljanin, 2008; Vandenberg & Lance, 2000), which was established by a series of increasingly restrictive, nested models via multi-group co”
- Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale (2014, methodology): “Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled.”
- Tourism Entrepreneurship Performance (2015, background): “…associations (related to the four performance construct items and two place identity items) could be caused by the highly overlapping content (see Byrne 2004) of the three enterprise performance questionnaire items (where profits, sales volume, and growth inquiries in the three-item questions…”