Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin

By Anupama Phene, Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist, Laurence A. Marsh. 2006

631 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/258d0416d3bfb4666103775b4601203fd2277973

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Creativity at the Knowledge Frontier: The Impact of Specialization in Fast- and Slow-paced Domains* (2018, methodology): “Following past research (Ahuja and Lampert, 2001; Phene, Fladmoe-Lindquist, and Marsh, 2006; Bikard, Murray, and Gans, 2015; Kaplan and Vakili, 2015), we first coded the publications belonging to the top 5 percent of highly cited publications in any given year as breakthroughs.”
Exploration and Exploitation in Innovation: Reframing the Interpretation (2008, background): “…& Deeds (2004), Vanhaverbeke & Peeters (2005), Garcia et al. (2003), Van Looy, Martens & Debackere (2005), Faems, Van Looy & Debackere (2005) Phene et al. (2006), Nerkar (2003), Sidhu, Volberda & Commandeur (2004), Sidhu, Commandeur & Volberda (2007), Rosenkopf & Nerkar (2001), Katila &…”
Emerging market multinational companies’ evolutionary paths to building a competitive advantage from emerging markets to developed countries (2016, background): “Phene, Fladmoe-Lindquist, and Marsh (2006) argue that radical innovations are valuable for developing competitive advantages, for reinvigorating firms caught in competency traps, and for staying alive in fast-evolving industries.”
Organizational factors and technological features in the development of green innovations: Evidence from patent analysis (2011, neutral): “Then, we included a variable to control for the companies’ technological capital (TechCap), measured as the number of patents successfully filed by the firms during the 5 years prior the filing date of the given patent (Phene et al. 2006).”
When birds of a feather don’t flock together: Different scientists and the roles they play in biotech R&D alliances (2013, background): “Older firms exhibit a lower quality of patented inventions, possibly because their knowledge in developing chemical-based drugs might limit their ability to generate high-impact innovations in biotechnology using more modern techniques (Phene et al., 2006).”
Beating Competitors to International Markets: The Value of Geographically Balanced Networks for Innovation (2014, background): “Phene, Fladmoe-Lindquist, and Marsh (2006) concluded in their study of technology-based firms that the simultaneous pursuit of technology across geographic dimensions is not useful in generating breakthrough inventions.”
Absorptive Capacity: A Process Perspective (2008, background): “…and dynamics of absorptive capacity across signifi cant numbers of organizations, and recent work has included studies of innovation networks (Adams et al., 2006; Hagedoorn et al., 2006; Phene et al., 2006) and knowledge transfer within alliances (Kim and Inkpen, 2005; Zhao et al., 2005).”
Exporting and innovating among emerging market firms: The moderating role of institutional development (2017, background): “Absorptive capacity hinges on multiple factors such as prior experience, accumulated knowledge, and the diversity of a firm’s knowledge sources (Phene et al., 2006).”
Knowledge Maturity and the Scientific Value of Innovations (2017, methodology): “The distance of knowledge seems to influence both its novelty and the ability to absorb it (Phene et al., 2006), whereas the rate of adoption of knowledge in the industry affects mostly the ability to benefit from knowledge application.”