Peer Groups, Social Identity, and Children's Bullying Behavior

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis☆ (2012, background): “Bullying incidence increases when endorsed by a peer group and regarded as a group norm (Duffy & Nesdale, 2008).”
Teenagers’ Explanations of Bullying (2011, background): “2008; Kless 1992; Neal 2007; Thornberg in press), probullying norms (Duffy and Nesdale 2009; Salmivalli and Voeten 2004), group processes and group pressure (Bukowski and Sippola 2001; Burns et al.”
Bullying Among Adolescent Football Players: Role of Masculinity and Moral Atmosphere (2012, background): “Similar to the significant relationship between peer influence and bullying in our study, a robust body of literature has suggested that peers play a role in this process (Duffy & Nesdale, 2009; Espelage & Holt, 2001; Heilbron & Prinstein, 2008; Ojala & Nesdale, 2004).”
Individual‐ and group‐level effects of social identification on workplace bullying (2013, background): “Finally, there is indirect evidence from school children that bullying is clustered within peer groups (Duffy & Nesdale, 2009 ).”
The Influence of Moral Disengagement, Morally Based Self-Esteem, Age, and Gender on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying (2013, background): “Similarly, Duffy and Nesdale (2008) found that bullies tended to form part of the same friendship group where being a bully represented an acceptable social norm within the group.”