Teenagers’ Explanations of Bullying
By Robert Thornberg, Sven Knutsen. 2011
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Plant Science, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5827b54936d983302218aadd537fa7b686dfab2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Plant Science
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Shes Weird! - The Social Construction of Bullying in School: A Review of Qualitative Research (2011, background): “…different or deviant in some way, such as having different clothes, appearance, behaviour or way of speaking (e.g. Frisén and others, 2007, 2008; Hamarus and Kaikkonen, 2008; Hazler and others, 1992; Horowitz and others, 2004; Thornberg, 2010; Thornberg and Knutsen, 2011; Varjas and others, 2008).”
- School Bullying as a Collective Action: Stigma Processes and Identity Struggling (2015, unknown): “In bullying, the participants often used dehumanising and oddness-related labels like ‘moron’, ‘ugly’, ‘nerd’, retarded’, ‘poor man’s clothes’ disgusting’, stupid’, stinking’ and ‘weird’, which confirm previous studies showing students’ proneness to make victim attributions in bullying (Bibou-Nakou ”
- Bystanders Are the Key to Stopping Bullying. (2013, background): “Youths classified as bullies were more likely to attribute the reason for bullying to the victim and much less to the bully, compared to victims, bystanders, and victims/bullies [17].”