Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective
By Marie-Claude Boudreau, Daniel Robey. Organ. Sci., 2005
1,154 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2516a5b9624b36d91ade40880b9e66ccd4f389ad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Paul M. Leonardi
- V. Venkatesh
- Susan V. Scott
- Heshan Sun
- Steven L. Alter
- Yongqiang Sun
- Stephen R. Barley
- Susan A. Brown
In Political Science and International Relations
- V. Venkatesh
- Steven L. Alter
- Susan A. Brown
- Paul M. Leonardi
- Diane M. Strong
- David Ribes
- Frantz Rowe
- S. J. Jackson
In Sociology and Political Science
- Paul M. Leonardi
- V. Venkatesh
- Heshan Sun
- Susan A. Brown
- Hillol Bala
- Michael G. Morris
- Steven L. Alter
- Yongqiang Sun
Citations in the corpus
- Job Characteristics and Job Satisfaction: Understanding the Role of Enterprise Resource (2010, background): “…this new context—the shakedown phase of ERP system implementation—and its role in shaping employee perceptions and other job outcomes (e.g., Boudreau and Robey 2005; Brynjolfsson and Hitt 1998; Davenport 2000; Davis and Hufnagel 2007; Galliers and Baetz 1998; Josefek and Kaufmann 2003;…”
- Organizational culture and leadership in ERP implementation (2008, background): “It is important for project leaders, power users and peers to help users use the system [15].”
- Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008, background): “…systems, interorganizational systems) and associated changes in business processes have a profound impact on employees’ job and cause changes in their job characteristics, relationships with others in the workplace, and other aspects of their job (Boudreau & Robey, 2005; Lapointe & Rivard, 2005).”
- Understanding User Revisions When Using Information Systems Features: Adaptive System Use and Triggers (2012, methodology): “Boudreau and Robey (2005) showed that employees usually react to a new information system with inertia because of the complexity of the new system, employees’ contentment with the status quo, and their frustration from early trials of the new system.”
- Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change (2007, background): “At one end of the spectrum, Boudreau and Robey (2005) take a human agency perspective and argue that an ES can be resisted or reinvented.”
- Channel integration quality, perceived fluency and omnichannel service usage: The moderating roles of internal and external usage experience (2018, background): “Consistentwith the human agency theory [34],Wixom& Todd [22] further indicated that object-based beliefs affected human behavior primarily through users' behavioral beliefs.”
- Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems (2013, background): “Mixed methods design strategies provide a powerful mechanism for IS researchers to deal with such situations and subsequently make contributions to theory and practice.”
- Artifacts that organize: Delegation in the distributed organization (2013, background): “Similar in spirit to large-scale enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in the corporate world (Boudreau & Robey, 2005; Volkoff, Strong, & Elmes, 2007), high performance eScience networks connect geographically and institutionally disparate researchers into a single networked computer ‘Grid’…”
- Where To Go From Here? Thoughts on Future Directions for Research on Individual-Level Technology Adoption with a Focus on Decision Making (2006, background): “There is some evidence from qualitative research about the potential far-reaching nature of the determinants and impacts of complex technology introductions, especially those including new business processes (e.g., Orlikowski, 1992; Boudreau & Robey, 2005).”
- Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality (2013, background): “…follows Mutch in making a critique of agential realism, it does so not because I believe that the theoretical foundation of agential realism is in any way inferior to the theoretical foundation of critical realism, but because the genre of critique allows me to most efficiently showcase their…”
- The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research (2010, background): “Such a relational ontology informs a number of perspectives that are beginning to influence research on technology in the management literature, and which may be characterized with the label “entanglement in practice.””
- When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change in Organizations? A Comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances (2013, background): “Inter-pretive field studies have shown that identical technologies can be used very differently by people working in different organizations (e.g., Edmondson et al. 2001), or even between people who work in different groups within the same organization (e.g., Boudreau and Robey 2005).”
- Who and What Really Counts? Stakeholder Prioritization and Accounting for Social Value (2015, neutral): “Accounting has an inherent material dimension, as to perform accounting it is necessary to create and establish data collection systems, databases, and associated reporting processes (Balogun, Jacobs, Jarzabkowski, Mantere, and Vaara, 2014; Bechky, 2003; Boudreau and Robey, 2005).”