Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems

2,357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How ‘Big Data’ Can Make Big Impact: Findings from a Systematic Review and a Longitudinal Case Study (2015, neutral): “This list has been used among other things to assess IS research rankings (Venkatesh, 2013), or to analyze both the level of knowledge development on RFID technology (S.”
An Enhanced Fear Appeal Rhetorical Framework: Leveraging Threats to the Human Asset Through Sanctioning Rhetoric (2015, methodology): “…assessment of the research model and its associated hypotheses, we followed a sequential mixedmethods research approach that incorporated qualitative and quantitative data collection (Venkatesh et al. 2013), the latter of which involved a two-group posttest-only randomized experimental design.”
What factors influence knowledge sharing in organizations? A social dilemma perspective of social media communication (2016, background): “In concurrent design, data collection occurs in parallel or synchronous manner independent of each other (Venkatesh et al. 2013).”
Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration (2016, methodology): “1 Although researchers have used the terms mixed methods and multimethod interchangeably in social and behavioral science, the two do differ conceptually (Venkatesh et al., 2013).”