The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination
By John F. Dovidio. 2010
534 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24d38cb858c5ae3ba0fb90a4bcd98c5eb1f00d15
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- M. Hogg
- David E. Rast
- K. Deaux
- Elizabeth L. Haines
- N. Lofaro
- Tessa E. S. Charlesworth
- Mahzarin R. Banaji
- Howard Giles
In Social Psychology
- M. Hogg
- David E. Rast
- D. van Knippenberg
- M. Verkuyten
- Nicolas Barreto
- John F. Dovidio
- Dominic Abrams
- S. Giessner
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Hogg
- John F. Dovidio
- D. van Knippenberg
- M. Verkuyten
- David E. Rast
- Dominic Abrams
- Nicolas Barreto
- S. Giessner
Citations in the corpus
- The skill paradox: explaining and reducing employment discrimination against skilled immigrants (2015, background): “Central to SIT is the notion of the social self (or group self; Ellemers, 2012), according to which individuals define in part who they are through their membership in social groups (for recent reviews of SIT, see Abrams & Hogg, 2010; Ellemers & Haslam, 2011).”
- Is Man the Measure of All Things? A Social Cognitive Account of Androcentrism (2018, background): “According to categorization theories, the graded structure of a category can be flexibly computed moment-to-moment, leading to shifts in typicality judgments (Abrams & Hogg, 2010; Hegarty, 2006; Kahneman & Miller, 1986; E. R. Smith & Zárate, 1992).”
- Public attitudes towards support for migrants: the importance of perceived voluntary and involuntary migration (2018, background): “CONTACT Maykel Verkuyten m.verkuyten@uu.nl (see Hainmueller and Hopkins 2014; Wagner, Christ, and Heitmeyer 2010).”
- Racism and Health I: Pathways and Scientific Evidence (2013, background): “Findings from surveys and studies employing experimental or quasi-experimental design have found that greater exposure to TV programs that describe blacks negatively was associated with higher levels of racial prejudice toward blacks (Mutz & Goldman, 2010).”
- Patterns of Implicit and Explicit Stereotypes III: Long-Term Change in Gender Stereotypes (2021, background): “…have occurred in the gender distributions of roles and occupations (e.g., in some subfields of science; Charlesworth & Banaji, 2019b), it may take additional time for these observed changes to trickle into reported stereotypes due to a “cultural lag” (Diekman et al., 2010; Koenig & Eagly, 2014).”
- Evaluation of and support for group prototypical leaders: a meta-analysis of twenty years of empirical research (2017, background): “…theory of leadership Drawing on social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1986; Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987; for overview see Abrams & Hogg, 2010) the key premise of the social identity theory of leadership is that we look to our leaders to define our group’s identity and…”
- The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity (2015, background): “Importantly, RWA and SDO are complementary, unique predictors of prejudice, both accounting for different aspects, such as prejudice towards different types of outgroups, and together explaining 50% of variance in prejudice (Altemeyer, 1998; Son Hing & Zanna, 2010; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2005).”
- Self-uncertainty and Support for Autocratic Leadership (2013, background): “…and social interactive processes specified by social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987; see Abrams & Hogg, 2010, for a recent overview) the social identity theory of leadership argues that when people identify strongly with a group they base…”
- The Times They Are a-Changing … or Are They Not? A Comparison of Gender Stereotypes, 1983–2014 (2016, background): “Perhaps cultural lag, as suggested by Diekman, Eagly, and Johnston (2010), is most likely to manifest itself in the more abstract, less specific, and less self-referent domain of trait attribution to others.”
- Dynamics of Group-Based Emotions: Insights From Intergroup Emotions Theory (2015, background): “Intergroup anxiety has potent effects, often making intergroup interaction a negative experience for the participants and potentially undermining the positive effects of intergroup contact for prejudice reduction (Richeson & Shelton, 2010).”
- Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations (2017, background): “We focus on and document just some of what we consider to be the most significant conceptual developments and extensions that have been made, over the past 20 years, to social identity theory broadly defined (also see Abrams & Hogg, 2010; Hogg, 2016).”
- The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments (2012, background): “Research confirms that enhanced identification is associated with greater conformity to norms and stronger ingroup favouritism (e.g., see Abrams & Hogg, 2010) and with fairer treatment of fellow ingroup members and more pronounced promotion of the group’s goals and welfare (De Cremer & Tyler, 2005;…”
- Going to extremes: Social identity and communication processes associated with gang membership (2014, background): “Social identity theory is a social cognitive theory of group processes, intergroup relations, and collective self-conception (e.g., Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987; also see Abrams & Hogg, 2010; Hogg, 2006; Hogg & Abrams, 1988).”
- How Stereotypes Are Shared Through Language: A Review and Introduction of the Social Categories and Stereotypes Communication (SCSC) Framework (2019, background): “Our operational definition of cognitive stereotype content, as noted above, is: the content of the cognitive representation people hold about a social category, consisting of beliefs and expectancies about probable behaviors, features, and traits (Dovidio et al., 2010).”